SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eleleth who wrote (11590)10/21/1997 5:01:00 AM
From: Douglas Nordgren  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29386
 
Eleleth, burning the midnight oil too? I guess owning Ancor can make you do that sometimes <g>.

Regarding Arcxel's Class 1 implementation and Ancor's patent, I can't say how Arcxel does it because I don't know, sorry. Perhaps some else does? However they do it, it may not be as elegant though, as deduced from their "less than 2 microsecond" (2000 nanosecond) latency. I would think the price point would be the salient issue, with Ancors' being able to weather competition with a higher margin?

Regards and g'night for real,

Douglas



To: Eleleth who wrote (11590)10/21/1997 7:24:00 AM
From: KJ. Moy  Respond to of 29386
 
<<<Do you think Arcxel has done an end-run around Ancor's patent or have they paid
royalties? Is Ancor's patent only for facilitating Class 1 instead of controlling Class 1? >>>

FC is an ANSI protocol standard. Nobody can have a lock on a standard, period. Having said that, someone, such as Ancor can, however, invented a patent which allowed them to have a better aggregation technique(much better in term of scaling). Ancor's products are better in building larger networks. Other vendors can build products based on the ANSI standard. They would have a hard time building products equals to Ancor's scalability. Cisco is famous in patents which allows them to build products better than their competitors based on 'STANDARDS'.