Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (421734)	10/2/2008 10:11:05 AM
From: HPilot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574745

Amazingly enough, the question on the supreme court case should have been an easy one for her...the supreme court recently reduced exxon's liability for the valdez spill by a lot of money...more than $2B. It affects Alaska and more importantly Alaskans...I can't imagine that she was not in tune with that one... Or maybe she is trying to fake the media out. Provide ammunition duds for the media to use. She has a debate coming which is more important than that interview. We shall see.

To: Alighieri who wrote (421734)	10/2/2008 10:32:38 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1574745

"...I can't imagine that she was not in tune with that one..." She doesn't think on her feet very well. She probably blanked on that one and went into BS mode. I think the fact that she is so incoherent when she is in BS mode is the tell. She just randomly strings together talking points and often doesn't even use complete sentences. One the surface she sounds articulate, but when you actually think about what she is saying you realize it is gibberish. Sort of like talking in tongues but using English sentence fragments.