SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (36275)10/3/2008 12:18:16 AM
From: Little Joe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 149317
 
Glenn:

I am sure Obama will lose some votes because he is African American and for the same reason he will gain some votes. Whether he is net better or worse off who can say.

I also do not know how the Bradley effect is playing out in the polls, but I am convinced as the result of some focus groups I watched that it will skew the polling. Not really sure how they account for it.

The interesting thing to me about this election is that as badly as McCain is doing and as badly as the republicans are doing that this is still close. I think that is, in part, because are fed up with both parties. Or maybe I am just self affirming because that is my view.

Little joe



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (36275)10/3/2008 11:13:17 AM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
SouthSide Irish baby....

DAK



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (36275)10/29/2008 2:24:19 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Obama's Record Fundraising Fails to Benefit TV Station Owners

By Tim Mullaney

Oct. 28 (Bloomberg) -- Television stations are finding as political campaigns end that Democrat Barack Obama's record $600 million fundraising isn't turning into an advertising bonanza.

A lack of competitive big-state Senate races, falling interest-group outlays and Republican John McCain's decision to accept campaign spending limits have led to a shortfall.

``We were very surprised at the lack of growth,'' said Kip Cassino, research director at Borrell Associates, an advertising consultant in Norfolk, Virginia. ``It puts the stations in a much worse spot than they thought they'd be in.''

Political ads were supposed to be the bright spot for station owners E.W. Scripps Co., Belo Corp. and Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc. in a year marred by less spending by auto dealers. Instead, campaign spending on local TV will fall to $984.3 million from 2004's $1.05 billion, Cassino said. Total ad sales for local TV will fall 8 percent this year, he said.

Election spending at Scripps's 10 TV stations will end up no better than 2006's $43 million and may fall from 2004, Bill Peterson, head of the Cincinnati company's broadcast unit, said in an interview earlier this month.

``We may make that, we may not'' said Peterson, whose ABC and NBC outlets include four stations in the battlegrounds of Florida and Ohio. ``We've seen less than we anticipated.''

Senate Races

Scripps, which gets about 30 percent of revenue from TV, reports third-quarter results on Nov. 7. Analysts project an operating profit of $8.2 million on sales of $241.2 million, the average of Bloomberg estimates. Comparisons aren't available because the company split off its cable and Web units in July.

The most expensive Senate race, between Republican incumbent Norm Coleman of Minnesota and Democrat Al Franken, had generated $21.2 million in ads as of Oct. 22, according to researcher TNS Media Intelligence. In Virginia, Republican senatorial candidate Jim Gilmore, who trails in polls, has an ad budget of $1 million.

``We hoped for some late money, but it looks like $1 million is going to be about it,'' said campaign manager Dick Leggitt.

Two years ago, spending in Connecticut, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania totaled more than $150 million.

``There's no competitive race in a top 10 media market,'' said Ken Goldstein, director of the Wisconsin Advertising Project, which studies political campaigns at the University of Wisconsin at Madison.

At the same time, McCain's decision to take public financing limited his general election spending to $84 million, up from $74.6 million in 2004.

527 Ads

While local TV is losing funds to field operations, cable and the Internet, overall ad spending is also falling short of estimates. Cassino cut his forecast for total political-ad outlays to $2.16 billion from $2.62 billion on Oct. 13.

Obama and McCain have discouraged interest groups known as 527s from advertising on their behalf. Those outlays have fallen to $198.8 million as of Sept. 30 from $442.5 million in 2004, according to the non-profit Center for Responsive Politics.

``527s are the dog that didn't bark,'' Goldstein said.

Politicians are also stretching their budgets, said Ed Rollins, a veteran strategist and chairman of Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee's run for the Republican presidential nomination.

Huckabee held a press conference explaining his decision not to run an ad attacking rival Mitt Romney and played the ad for reporters, Rollins said. It's still on YouTube.

``It looks like a lot is being done, but not a lot is being done,'' Rollins said. ``You produce an ad and put it on Facebook, or you get CNN to run it. There are a lot of games going on.''

Gannett

Gannett Co.'s second-half political ads will beat 2004's total and ``may achieve what we were able to do in 2006,'' Gracia Martore, chief financial officer of the McLean, Virginia- based broadcaster and publisher, said on an Oct. 24 conference call.

This month, Leland Westerfield, an analyst with BMO Capital Markets in New York, cut his profit estimate for Dallas-based Belo Corp. by 5 cents to 91 cents a share, saying Obama wasn't contesting Arizona and Texas, home to nine of the company's 21 stations. In the Texas Senate race, incumbent Republican John Cornyn leads Democrat Rick Noriega by 15 points, according to an Oct. 21 Rasmussen Reports poll.

Belo's political ads sales will likely to fall to $50.7 million from $52.8 million in 2004, Westerfield estimates. Like Scripps, Belo split in two this year. Belo spokesman Paul Fry said in an interview the company has consistently had political revenue of around $50 million every election year since 2000.

Late Spurt

Sinclair, based in Hunt Valley, Maryland, said on Oct. 27 that a spurt in political ads during the past two weeks will soften a projected drop in fourth-quarter sales.

The owner of 58 Fox, ABC, CBS affiliates and other stations now expects revenue to decline by a mid-to-low single-digit percentage. Political ads through nine months totaled $15.5 million, down from $17.7 million four years ago.

This year's campaigns may also signal a lasting change, with Obama diverting millions to technology and field operations. His $39 million effort to win Florida is split between TV and efforts to turn out 1.4 million black and young voters who stayed home in 2004, campaign manager David Plouffe said in a Sept. 17 video.

``That's how he won the primaries and that's what he believes in,'' said Eileen Kotecki, finance director for Al Gore's 2000 campaign.

To contact the reporter on this story: Tim Mullaney in New York at tmullaney1@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: October 29, 2008 00:01 EDT



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (36275)10/30/2008 5:22:13 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Counterpoint: 8 reasons Obama will win
_______________________________________________________________

By Eric Zorn

October 30, 2008

In Tuesday's column, I offered '08 reasons John McCain might still pull off an upset in next week's '08 presidential election.

Today I offer '08 reasons Barack Obama will nevertheless win handily:

1. Obama's supporters are more energized.

Obama draws enormous crowds wherever he goes and has energized young and first-time voters in a way that will surprise pollsters relying on traditional turnout models. A recent USA Today/Gallup poll found 74 percent of Obama voters saying they are more enthusiastic about voting this time than in previous elections. Only 48 percent of McCain voters said the same.

These jazzed Obama supporters don't see their vote as the weary, defensive choice of the lesser of two evils, but as an exciting chance to create a brighter future.

2. Obama has a superior ground game.

In part because Sen. Hillary Clinton challenged him deep into the primary season, Obama is better organized at the neighborhood level than any Democratic presidential candidate in history.

His campaign is also making landmark use of technology—using e-mail, text messages and social-networking sites to keep in touch with supporters and urge them to the polls.

3. Obama has a superior air game.

Obama is so flush with cash that he's able to saturate TV and radio in key markets at the end of the campaign with ads that counter McCain's criticisms of him and launch attacks on McCain.

It's not just the money but the determination to respond rapidly and vehemently inside the space of a single news cycle.

4. McCain has lost his brand.

Yes, he's a volatile man running in sensitive times under the banner of troubled party. But he started off with the image of a bipartisan straight-shooter with a clear, selfless sense of proportion.

Yet he's campaigned like a crank. His scattershot, over-the-top assaults on Obama's character (or, rather, the character of Obama's associates) have seemed like an effort to change the subject from important issues. And now that McCain's finally settled on conservative tax policy as his theme down the stretch, his campaign is so desperate for traction that it's going schoolyard—channeling Joe McCarthy and calling Obama a socialist, a Marxist and even a communist.

5. Sarah Palin is turning out to be the disasta' from Alaska.

I'm confident historians will rank McCain's decision to choose a rookie governor from a low-population state to be his running mate as his biggest miscalculation. Palin's youth, spunkiness and conservative bona fides fired up the Republican base, sure. But her ignorance, on display in early TV interviews, mortified the rest of us, and polls now show her as a distinct drag on the ticket.

McCain's appalling judgment in selecting Palin has been cited by Colin Powell, several high-profile conservative intellectuals and scores of newspaper editorial boards as a reason to support Obama.

6. Obama hasn't lost his cool.

Historians will also note the textbook discipline of the Obama campaign, which stuck to a set of fairly simple "change" messages while the McCain campaign kept trying out new themes. This steadiness has been mirrored by Obama's own equanimity, particularly during the debates in which he looked and sounded far more presidential than the twitchy, simpering McCain.

The more people saw of Obama, the less he seemed like the frightening, radical, terrorist sympathizer in McCain's cartoonish rhetoric.

7. McCain hasn't been able to fight the Bush head winds.

No matter how many times McCain said "maverick," he still couldn't create enough distance from the deeply unpopular president to make the sale to voters hungering for new leadership.

8. Obama has been lucky.

Things have been relatively quiet all year on the terror and national security fronts—McCain's strengths. And the major crisis of the campaign season—the economic meltdown—not only played into one of Obama's perceived strong suits, it also caused McCain to appear impulsive and indecisive in the face of a sudden challenge.

This is not a taunt or a guarantee, but I expect that luck to hold at least through Tuesday night.

Copyright © 2008, Chicago Tribune

chicagotribune.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (36275)12/1/2008 11:54:10 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Chicago's Stake in Detroit
_______________________________________________________________

By Bob Tita And Monée Fields-White
Crain's Chicago Business
Dec. 01, 2008

The collapse of a Detroit automaker would send shock waves through Chicago, from South Side manufacturers to northwest suburban dealerships to downtown TV studios.

As General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC seek a multibillion-dollar lifeline from the federal government, many Illinois companies and workers are holding their breath. The state's stake in Detroit is huge: Illinois trails only Michigan, Ohio and Indiana in the number of auto-supplier jobs in the U.S. More than 80,000 jobs statewide are directly tied to the auto industry, government figures show, and one estimate puts the total number of workers with direct links to automakers at more than three times that number.

The industry pumped more than $16 billion last year into the state economy through assembly plants, parts makers and car sales. If a Detroit automaker goes under, thousands of jobs will be lost, hundreds of businesses hurt and millions of dollars drained from the local economy.

"I would hate to imagine the trickle-down effects of the job loss if these companies are allowed to just close up," says Greg Baise, president of the Illinois Manufacturers Assn. "It would have a much broader impact than it would have had 30 years ago."

That's because automakers have outsourced much of their supply chain over the years, including parts-making. Illinois has about 200 auto-parts manufacturing operations today.

Those plants employ tens of thousands of workers; three auto assembly plants employ another 7,000. Total employment attributed to the auto sector — including related businesses such as those that supply or service parts makers — is about 267,600, or roughly 4% of the state's total workforce, according to a 2007 study by the Center for Automotive Research, an industry think tank in Ann Arbor, Mich. (The group gets some funding from the auto industry.)

Declining auto sales already have led the Big Three carmakers and their suppliers to cut production. "We have had three significant across-the-board staffing reductions this year and almost monthly reductions in the hourly workforce," says Andy Mickus, director of operations at BorgWarner Inc.'s Bellwood and Frankfort plants, which make parts for automatic transmissions.

BorgWarner, which moved to suburban Detroit from Chicago in 2005, is especially vulnerable because it makes most of its sales to the Detroit Three. Nearly half of sales at the Bellwood and Frankfort plants are from General Motors; 16% come from Ford, and about 8% from Chrysler. Mr. Mickus oversees 422 hourly and salaried employees, down from 687 at the end of 2007 and 769 in 2006. Unless the industry improves, "there will be additional reductions" at his plants in the first quarter, he says.

Small parts-makers face an even darker future. "We don't have any orders," says Steven Pelke, chief operating officer of Calumet City-based Kay Manufacturing Co., which produces transmission components for Ford and General Motors. He laid off about 30 of his 75 employees this fall and expects to be idle for most of December. He's scaled back on purchases and other spending. His sales staff is still pursuing new orders. "We're almost shut down," he says.

The biggest local suppliers, companies such as Illinois Tool Works Inc. and Tenneco Inc., also are feeling the pain. The foreign and domestic auto industry accounted for about 10% of Glenview-based ITW's more than $16 billion in 2007 sales. Ford, General Motors and Chrysler accounted for about 35% of Tenneco's $6.2 billion in 2007 sales.

Tenneco CEO Gregg Sherrill says the collapse of one or more of the Detroit assemblers would jeopardize the Lake Forest-based company's ability to serve its remaining customers by draining operating cash and leaving a glut of manufacturing capacity.

"These guys are still major players," Mr. Sherrill says.

Automakers are major customers for local steel plants, too. Charles Bradford, a steel industry analyst in New York, estimates that as much as 90% of the 5 million tons of flat-rolled steel produced annually at ArcelorMittal USA's Burns Harbor plant in Indiana is channeled to the auto industry. The Chicago-based steelmaker indicated recently it may lay off up to 2,444 workers at the mill by the end of January because of slumping demand.

A third or more of the U.S. car dealers affiliated with Detroit will go out of business if a Big Three company collapses, industry observers predict. If true, that would be devastating here. About 300 car dealerships in the Chicago metro area alone are tied to a Big Three company.

"A Chapter 11 filing by GM or any other automaker would be devastating," says John Phelan, owner of Jack Phelan Chevrolet in Lyons and Jack Phelan Dodge-Isuzu-Suzuki in Berwyn. "People would be asking the question: 'Do I want to buy a car from an entity that might not be in business three years from now?' "

Mr. Phelan, 58, has been in the business for 26 years. He sold 800 cars at his Chevy dealership last year but expects that number to drop by 150 this year.

Michael Ettleson, part-owner of Ettleson Cadillac-Buick-Pontiac-GMC in Hodgkins and Ettleson Hyundai in Countryside, was approached recently by a broker offering to buy his GM dealership to make way for a Wal-Mart parking lot. They couldn't agree on a price, "but the offer was interesting for me," he says.

For Mr. Ettleson, the crisis began in October, when his sales fell 50%. "Car sales overnight came to a halt," he says.

Lattof Chevrolet of Arlington Heights closed its doors Oct. 10 after more than 70 years in business at the same Northwest Highway location. The company, which once had $30 million in annual sales, was in its third generation of family ownership. The closure put 65 employees out of work.

"It's a shame to see this," says Arlington Heights Mayor Arlene Mulder. "Lattof Chevrolet for years was synonymous with the town of Arlington Heights. Everybody bought their cars there. . . . It was a Lattof who helped us build a hospital in our town 50 years ago."

In addition to the sentimental loss, the closure will hit Arlington Heights' budget. In the first six months of this year, the village of 77,000 had tax income from sales of cars and auto parts totaling $730,000, down from $838,000 in the first six months of 2007 and $915,000 in that period in 2006. The village has an annual operating budget of $60 million.

While much attention has been focused on the Big Three's struggles, much of of misery has been outsourced to the nation's auto parts makers. Read how this is affecting local parts makers. Arlington Heights has seen Nissan and Lexus dealers open on Dundee Road, which Ms. Mulder hopes will blossom into a new auto row.

Other towns, including Countryside, Libertyville and Schaumburg, are seeing declines in sales tax revenue, as well.

Three dealerships, selling Dodge, Pontiac and Lincoln-Mercury brands, closed in Countryside during the past year, says the village's finance director, Gail Paul. Ten dealerships remain, offering 12 brands, she says.

Largely as a result of the three businesses shutting down, sales tax revenue dropped more than 4% for the first seven months of the fiscal year, which started May 1, she says. Almost half of the sales tax comes from auto dealers and other auto-related businesses, she says.

"We have been dependent on car dealers for many years, and our sales tax has been stagnant for I'd say the past six years," Ms. Paul says.

National automotive advertising spending through August fell 5.7% year over year, to $248,000 per dealer, according to national figures. That's bad news for local media outlets. Chicago TV stations derived about $350 million from auto-related advertising last year, and the 2008 pace is about 20% below that, with most of the decline occurring in the second half, according to one Chicago station's estimates.

Automotive-related advertising accounts for 20% to 30% of the advertising pie at newspapers and TV stations, says Jerry Cizek III, president of the Chicago Auto Trade Assn., a trade group for about 500 local dealers.

WLS-TV/Channel 7 gets 18% to 20% of its advertising revenue from auto dealers, says Station Manager Emily Barr. She estimates that auto-related ad spending is off 50% this quarter from the year-earlier period. "It's not pretty," she says. "You really can't sugarcoat it."

WMAQ-TV/Channel 5 General Manager Larry Wert says overall ad spending at his station is down 20% this quarter.

While Ms. Barr says she's not planning layoffs, Mr. Wert says "all of these things are contributing to our need to re-engineer, which includes our cost model."

Cantele Sedivy & Associates Advertising Inc. in Wheaton says auto-related advertising, which represents about 35% of its business, is down about 50%. "This whole year has been a tough year," says Mike Sedivy, a partner.

Last year, Leo Burnett Co. became the lead creative agency for GM's Buick, Pontiac and GMC divisions. In July, GM Chief Executive Rick Wagoner announced unspecified cutbacks in advertising and marketing spending even after the company's advertising spending during the first half of 2008 had dropped 6% to $1.2 billion.

"We've implemented most of those reductions," says a GM spokeswoman, adding, "Going into '09, all budgets have been tightened, including this one."

Leo Burnett declines to comment.

Of course, the most direct impact is felt by the assembly line workers.

Ronda Holliday, one of more than 100 Ford employees laid off from the company's Chicago Heights stamping plant in November, declined a buyout offer because her years of service with the company put her near the top of the call-back list if orders pick up.

Production workers like Ms. Holliday, of Merrillville, Ind., earn $24 to $26 an hour.

"I'm hoping and praying that I made the right decision and will be called back," says the 41-year-old single mother of three.

©2008 by Crain Communications Inc.