Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (422045)	10/3/2008 12:19:06 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1576271

There's real science behind them. You're just showing ignorance. Learn a thing or two. Bah. Science and facts......when were they ever important to steve? Stop thinking like a lib.

To: SilentZ who wrote (422045)	10/3/2008 1:16:22 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576271

If CNN polled their viewers, they polled liberals.

To: SilentZ who wrote (422045)	10/3/2008 1:18:26 PM
From: HPilot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576271

>CNN produced their usual "democrat won" poll after the debate. You mean the one that is half men and half women, but nothing said about how many are Democrats?

To: SilentZ who wrote (422045)	10/3/2008 1:44:01 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576271

Z, > There's real science behind them. Hence the reason why they shouldn't be overhyped as much as the mainstream media is doing. I shake my head every time the polls move like a couple of percentage points and that becomes "news." Even with the margin of error, the actual election results sometimes fall outside of the ranges predicted by the polls. As for the CNN push poll, they didn't report this time whether they polled more Democrats than Republicans like they did when they polled the first Obama-McCain debate. Tenchusatsu