Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (50039)	10/4/2008 8:54:44 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224720

No I did not. What is your opinion on Biden not giving to charities?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (50039)	10/4/2008 8:55:36 AM
From: TideGlider	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224720

Apparently the IRS agreed with her filing. Maybe you should write them and get a portion of money recovered. In the mean time maybe people will write them requesting you be audited.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (50039)	10/4/2008 8:59:31 AM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 224720

What is your opinion on Biden stating that the US and France removed Hezbollah from Lebanon and he and barack requested Nato move in then. They didn't and now Hezbollah is part of the Lebanese government. The US and France did not do that. Nobody did that. What the hell kind of psychotic drugs is that dope on?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (50039)	10/4/2008 10:07:32 AM
From: tonto	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224720

We now know for sure that Kenneth lied about Palin's husband being an OIL and GAS TYCOON. They certainly do not make much money. Did you see that Sarah Palin did not list, as income, the $17,000 per diem she received while living in her own home?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (50039)	10/4/2008 11:00:05 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224720

Dear Kenneth E. Phillipps libeling an individual American citizen saying that they have made comments about a race or ethnic group that that group are to be scorned and dismissed and treated as inferior by the birth origin is a most profound evil. Kenneth E. Phillipps, do lawyers and Democrats not find such libel as a most profound evil? Kenneth E. Phillipps, This is the clear perfect example of that most profound evil. But the above is topped by the hideos libel of the obama Dos Caras, Two Faces ad. The ad is Pure racist hate inciting propaganda constructed on more libel of an individual American citizen. How does Kenneth E. Phillipps so revently preach for such manifest evil as obama? youtube.com A commentary on the ad. plnewsforum.com Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has launched a new Spanish-language TV ad that seeks to paint Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., as anti-immigrant, even tying the Republican to his longtime conservative talk-radio nemesis Rush Limbaugh. As first reported by the Washington Post, Obama’s ad features a narrator saying: “They want us to forget the insults we’ve put up with…the intolerance…they made us feel marginalized in this country we love so much.” The screen then shows these two quotes from Limbaugh: “…stupid and unskilled Mexicans” —Rush Limbaugh “You shut your mouth or you get out!” —Rush Limbaugh The narrator then says, “John McCain and his Republican friends have two faces. One that says lies just to get our vote…and another, even worse, that continues the policies of George Bush that put special interests ahead of working families. John McCain…more of the same old Republican tricks.” There are some real factual problems with this ad, which is titled “Dos Caras,” or two faces. ... By linking McCain to Limbaugh’s quotes, twisting Limbaugh’s quotes, and tying McCain to more extremist anti-immigration voices, the Obama campaign has crossed a line into misleading the viewers of its new TV ad. In Spanish, the word is erróneo.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (50039)	10/4/2008 5:31:02 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224720

Per diem is compensation for expenses incurred, and is not taxed. Palin's per diem was completely above board and according to the law.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (50039)	10/4/2008 5:53:18 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 224720

IOW Palin didn't misstate her taxable income.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (50039)	10/6/2008 12:08:39 PM
From: DizzyG	3 Recommendations Respond to of 224720

No, Kenneth...but I did see this: Palin gives more to charity than Biden By Sam Youngman Posted: 10/03/08 05:07 PM [ET] Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin made considerably less money than rival Sen. Joe Biden, but the Palin family gave more to charity in the last two years than Biden has in the last eight combined, according to Palin's tax records released Friday afternoon. Palin, the running mate of presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), and her husband Todd reported meager earnings from 2006 and 2007, at least by presidential-politics standards. In 2006, the Palins paid $11,944 in taxes on $127,869 in income. In 2007, they paid $24,738 on $166,080. But in 2006, they donated $4,880 to charity, and in 2007, they donated $3,325. By contrast, Biden (D-Del.), Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama's running mate, has donated a total of $3,690 since 1998 despite his higher Senate salary, according to an analysis posted by National Review. The timing of the release of the Palins tax records has become something of a tradition. Campaigns wait until Friday afternoon, when the news cycle slows to a grind and reporters are focused elsewhere — in this case, Congress's passage and the president's signing of the financial rescue package. thehill.com LOL! Diz-