Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (422660)	10/5/2008 5:11:34 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575856

According to the link you cited, she did: The bill's Republican co-sponsor remembers things differently. "I know she was very strongly behind this," said Rep. Lynn. Asked why, if Palin supported the bill, one of her administration's officials would speak against it, Lynn demurred. "We don't all work in lockstep here," he said. "People have different opinions," he added. Lynn said he and Palin agreed to re-introduce the bill next January, and push to pass it then. He wanted the accounting tightened up. In every other case, he was on the side of less and looser regulatio McCain, like most republicans favors less regulation. But the record is absolutely clear on this issue -- the Republicans wanted tighter controls on these loans to people who couldn't afford them, and the Dems stonewalled. It is McCain's fault for not hammering Obama with this. And the liberal media's. He voted on one procedural bill that had that clause in there. As I said, he supported it.