Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (23307)	10/6/2008 1:24:22 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 25737

(He must be 'naive', eh?) <g>

To: Bill who wrote (23307)	10/6/2008 1:34:21 PM
From: pompsander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

"between 2000 and 2006 Pomp, you don't even know who was in power in your date ranges. Clearly, you don't understand how congress works." _____________________________ What did I miss? Do you want me to say 2001 to 2007 when the congresses were sworn in instead of the election dates? Are you referring to the tiny window on the senate side where the dems popped their head up briefly to joint status...and then to one seat lead for 14 months? What do you mean Bill?2007 110th R D - 51** D - 233 2005 109th R R - 55 R - 232 2003 108th R R - 51 R - 229 2001 107th R D* R - 221 1999 106th D R - 55 R - 223 1997 105th D R - 55 R - 228 1995 104th D R - 52 R - 230 uspolitics.about.com Jeffords hopped over for 18 months in 2001-02 the dems had a one seat advantage in the senate. Is that your point?