SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (423063)10/6/2008 6:53:43 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572800
 
That you would cite this utter nonsense is just proof positive that you are the crackpot partisan jerk you are.

I told you...this is not al gore...smear and expect it to bounce back...it doesn't matter what the details are anymore in this website than they do in palin/mccain's attacks on obama.

Try to be just a little bit intellectually honest for a change. If you can.

In my most "dishonest" attempt I am far more honest than you are in your normal state...

PS: moron (that's for the jerk above)

Al



To: i-node who wrote (423063)10/6/2008 7:09:59 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572800
 
Palin's World



To: i-node who wrote (423063)10/6/2008 7:24:42 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572800
 
Look. We all know the K5 story. You, I, and everyone here witnessed it. There was no wrongdoing on McCain's part -- that is well established. He was the only Republican involved, and the Democrats dragged him in solely to keep the investigation from being all corrupt Democrats.

McCain was totally exonerated. 100%. There is not one allegation against McCain that is legitimate in the K5 scandal.


McCain was not innocent when it came to the Keating 5. Besides flying around the country in Keating's plane, his wife and Keating did lots of business......did you think the relationship was all innocence and purity? And then there is this:

"On April 2, 1987, a meeting with chairman Gray of the FHLBB was held in DeConcini's Capitol office, with Senators Cranston, Glenn, and McCain also in attendance.[7] The senators requested that no staff be present.[12] DeConcini started the meeting with a mention of "our friend at Lincoln."[7] Gray told the assembled senators that he did not know the particular details of the status of Lincoln Savings and Loan, and that the senators would have to go to the bank regulators in San Francisco that had oversight jurisdiction for the bank. Gray did offer to set up a meeting between those regulators and the senators.[7]

On April 9, 1987, a two-hour meeting[4] with three members of the FHLBB San Francisco branch was held, again in DeConcini's office, to discuss the government's investigation of Lincoln.[11][7] Present were Cranston, DeConcini, Glenn, McCain, and additionally Riegle.[7] The regulators felt that the meeting was very unusual and that they were being pressured by a united front, as the senators presented their reasons for having the meeting.[7] DeConcini began the meeting by saying, "We wanted to meet with you because we have determined that potential actions of yours could injure a constituent."[13] McCain said, "One of our jobs as elected officials is to help constituents in a proper fashion. ACC [American Continental Corporation] is a big employer and important to the local economy. I wouldn't want any special favors for them.... I don't want any part of our conversation to be improper." Glenn said, "To be blunt, you should charge them or get off their backs," while DeConcini said, "What's wrong with this if they're willing to clean up their act? ... It's very unusual for us to have a company that could be put out of business by its regulators."[7] The regulators then revealed that Lincoln was under criminal investigation on a variety of serious charges, at which point McCain severed all relations with Keating.[7] Glenn continued to help Keating after that revelation, by setting up a meeting with then-House Majority Leader Jim Wright, which turned out to be the only questionable thing Glenn did throughout the whole affair.[14]"


en.wikipedia.org

McCain only backed off when he thought he might get into trouble......and not because he wanted to do the ethically right thing.

But forget about Keating for the moment, what about McCain's involvement in the US Council for World Freedom? You keep ignoring that little brouhaha!



To: i-node who wrote (423063)10/6/2008 7:27:57 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1572800
 
"McCain was totally exonerated. 100%."

History says you're totally WRONG, Dave.

en.wikipedia.org

"McCain and Keating had become personal friends following their initial contacts in 1981,[11] and McCain was the only one of the five with close social and personal ties to Keating.[33][34] Like DeConcini, McCain considered Keating a constituent as he lived in Arizona.[27] Between 1982 and 1987, McCain had received $112,000 in political contributions from Keating and his associates.[35] In addition, McCain's wife Cindy McCain and her father Jim Hensley had invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators. McCain, his family, and their baby-sitter had made nine trips at Keating's expense, sometimes aboard Keating's jet. Three of the trips were made during vacations to Keating's opulent Bahamas retreat at Cat Cay. McCain did not pay Keating (in the amount of $13,433) for some of the trips until years after they were taken, when he learned that Keating was in trouble over Lincoln.[7][36] Because of these connections, Phoenix New Times writer Tom Fitzpatrick stated in 1989 that McCain was the "most reprehensible" of the five.[37]"