SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (423258)10/7/2008 10:31:48 AM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572383
 
Is the concept insane?

Suppose terrorists decided they wanted not only to attack the United States, but to change it fundamentally. How might they go about that?


Madness now setting in...you are unstable...really

Al



To: i-node who wrote (423258)10/7/2008 10:59:43 AM
From: bentway2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572383
 
You're just diving deeper into your own paranoia, Dave. Keep on that path, and you'll convince yourself it's your "patriotic duty" to take action.

That's how the mental process goes with all our presidential assassins. They saw themselves as patriots, except for John Hinckley - he just wanted to impress Jody Foster.



To: i-node who wrote (423258)10/7/2008 11:00:06 AM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572383
 
"Is the concept insane?"

Yes. You operate from a position of "it might be true, so it must be".

That is nuts.

"Suppose terrorists decided they wanted not only to attack the United States, but to change it fundamentally"

This is what I mean. You are right up there with a second gunman killing Kennedy. Or that 9/11 was an inside job. Like all conspiracy theories you imagine a greater deal of control over people talking than is actually possible.

Which is crazy.