SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (40885)10/8/2008 6:13:45 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218621
 
<<plain truth is $700 billion ain’t enough>> ... i agree.

just in in-tray

player #1: For those who care, a summary of the financial position of many Gold Mining shares.
Of the larger producers, Goldcorp and IAMGOLD look interesting and conservative here. Yamana's net debt is less than 2009 Free Cash Flow estimates.
See attached.

player #2: imo most important is to concentrate on 'pure plays' - i.e. companies that produce primarily gold and are not dependent on a lot of byproduct credits from base metals. the ones with big byproduct credits such as AEM and AUY are likely to have disappointing increases in their reported cash costs. some of that is no doubt factored in by now, but the fact is, gold keeps rising against the other commodities, so the pure play gold producers have the best upside in terms of profit margins. this goes especially for the higher cost producers such as the South African companies. it may be just a coincidence, but e.g. HMY is today one of the strongest performers on the gold board. it makes sense though, as the company produces nothing but gold (it has farmed out half of its future copper mine to a JV with Newcrest and 60% of its future uranium production to a JV with a South African conglomerate), has relatively high (but falling) costs, and a strong project pipeline, that is likewise entirely focused on gold production.



To: elmatador who wrote (40885)10/9/2008 2:13:03 AM
From: energyplay  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218621
 
The "Bank Holiday" went on far too long, and cause extensive problems in the rest of the economy. That appeared to be the intent - make people more desparate so they would go along with the FDR cabal's more extreme proposals.