Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Amati investors -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pat mudge who wrote (27570)	10/21/1997 1:34:00 PM
From: Bob Frasca	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 31386

[Chat - Y2K stocks] Hi Pat: A few months back, maybe longer, you and I engaged in a brief discussion regarding ZITL and so called, Y2K solutions. The following press release is, in this humble coders opinion, the REAL deal. My guess is that Y2K stocks are going to tumble if they haven't already. The solution is simple and, in a manner of speaking, elegant. Bob Tuesday October 21 9:31 AM EDT Company Press Release Year 2000 Solution Fits Inside Compilers ENCINO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 21, 1997--People know that 99 + 1 = 100. But computers don't. This simple difference has caused the $600 billion Year 2000 computer problem that threatens to cripple businesses and governments. Most computer programs store years as only two digits and add 1900 to those digits. 1983 is stored as 83 and 2000 is stored as 00. But computers understand 00 as 1900. Current thinking is that more digits need to be added to hold the century. Otherwise, the computer must ''guess.'' Both of these methods (expansion and windowing) require significant program changes. David and william Lappen, brothers involved in computer technology for more than 20 years each, have applied for a patent on a method that promises to virtually eliminate the Year 2000 problem. Its premise is that there's no need to change the old programs or databases. The problem is really that the computer gives the wrong answer when it adds 99 and 1. This can be solved by making some small changes to the way computers represent numbers. More than 90 percent of the energy and expense needed to implement and test a Year 2000 solution can be saved, and errors virtually eliminated. There is room in two digits to store more than the traditional 100 numbers. Instead of changing application code, by telling computers how to store additional digits in the same space, the problem can be automatically fixed. This requires no changes to programs or databases. Technical details of the ''19T0'' Solution can be found on the Internet site, 19t0.com or can be obtained via e-mail or fax. IBM has recently given credence to the concept that compilers can greatly assist in solving the Year 2000 problem. Their Millennium Language Extension (MLE) implements fixed windowing in compilers. But, it requires programmers to identify which variables are to be ''windowed'' and what the cutoffs are. The 19T0 Solution doesn't require either of these. Additionally, windowing is not appropriate for banking, insurance and government where ages over 100 are represented. The 19T0 Solution can represent well over 150 years in two position variables. This makes it suitable for these industries. Other compiler manufacturers (such as Sun Microsystems, Digital Equipment Corp., Unisys, Microsoft) can implement the 19T0 Solution in their compilers and offer their customers an automatic solution to the Year 2000 problem. Instead of hiring tens of thousands of programmers to comb through billions of lines of code, businesses and governments just need to get updated compilers that automatically implement the 19T0 Solution. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Contact: 19T0 Solutions, Encino William Lappen, 818/789-6531

To: pat mudge who wrote (27570)	10/22/1997 11:27:00 AM
From: Cliff Wood	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31386

<Re 56K intellectual property disputes> And we think we have problems. Its interesting that major firms get themselves locked up in a p-----g contest when time is of the essence in exploiting a technology that may have a narrow window of applicabiltiy. I hope the telcos get the message that agreeing to agree on the technical issues may save them all from oblivion. The demand for bandwith is going to be so intense that business and the public is going to go with the first available technology that is effective and affordable. If the mgmt of the telcos would spend a few minutes of their time thinking about what their customers want, spend the money to provide it and less time and money putting the next global merger together, they would probably be more profitable and successfull longer term. I WANT FASTER DATA!!! Through and Oracle 8 I hope. Cliff