To: s martin who wrote (6935 ) 10/21/1997 1:23:00 PM From: Roo Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 55532
As I understand your post(and take this as you will, I am not putting words in your mouth, I am giving you insight as to what understand your message to mean), there are basically two camps out there. The blindly ignorant believers of a pending short squeeze, and the smart well-informed folks who do their DD. I mean this sincerely. Since your list of DD performers is exclusively nays, doesn't it stand to reason that you are portraying those who have performed DD on OVIS/RMIL as not liking what they found, and therefore become nays??? I would suggest that you take a stroll back through this thread and the previous OVIS/OVLP thread and peruse the posts. You may be humoured to find that the ignorant masses are made up of some of the most competent DD jockeys around thanks to the constant defensive posture needed to deal with those who omit, misconstrue, and falsify information in order to serve their own means on this thread. Yes, I realize that if I claim the cartel has successfully refuted 100 negative claims by the nays, you (or another nay) will promptly crop up with "but what about <insert negative claim #101 here> ??? The nays appear to have a fairly creative and never-ending source of pitfalls for investors in this company, and so it is to you (all nays) that I take my hat off and say "Thanks for the education. I don't believe I fully understood the importance of DD before we met!" And finally, in the end, If I'm wrong, I'm sure you'll be there to recap the final lesson. If I'm right however, don't bother to look for a gloat from me. I'll be too busy with real life to be spending time posting info on a company I am not invested in. Thanks for the donuts -R#42you bet!