SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cirrus who wrote (51087)10/10/2008 5:38:58 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224729
 
Some states said they would drive to peoples houses and give them a photo ID, the dems fought those Laws, why ?

Banks require ID, paying by check sometimes require ID.



To: cirrus who wrote (51087)10/10/2008 7:14:00 PM
From: Geoff Altman  Respond to of 224729
 
I don't really have problem with a photo ID, but as Bates pointed out photo ID is a solution to a problem that doesn't appear to exist.

I believe it does exist, however, the real issue here is perception by the voter. Not a good thing if voters start losing faith in the system when there's such a simple fix for it.....


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News