SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ellen who wrote (6966)10/21/1997 2:03:00 PM
From: Riley G  Respond to of 55532
 
This number is the one I wanted......
No offense Ellen.

A Buddist thing,
Riley G



To: Ellen who wrote (6966)10/21/1997 2:04:00 PM
From: Riley G  Respond to of 55532
 
Rocky Mountain International (OTC: RMIL)
formerly known as Olympus Ventures. Inc. (OVIS)
--------------------------
Olympus Ventures,Inc. web site:
olympusventures.com

Here is the Company telephone & fax numbers: Call them and request an investors package and talk to the CEO. 1-954-565-9292 (Florida) or fax at 1-954-565-8894.

Rocky Mountain Crystal Water web site:
goodbuys.com
-----------------------------

Date: 97-08-07 21:06:10 EDT

What do you mean when you say were did I come across this stock? I researched this turnaround company with its low float and LARGE short interest.

I and others believe that OVIS has been hit heavily by Market Maker MM) shorts. I have reason to believe that there are some 2 million MM plus EXTRA shares out there that will have to be covered someday. Take a look at what happened to Knickerbocker, Resorts International, IOMEGA, Presstek, Diana, etc.. when short busters moved in on those stocks. They went through the roof as the shorts tried to cover and others (day traders) moved into catch the action.

OVIS is not being hyped. It has turned around with the new management team and has turned to the black rather than the red. Look for OVIS to be at $12 to $15 in 12 months based upon projected revenues. If a short squeeze is applied then we could see major $$$$ as the shorts scramble to cover.

I am forming a cartel of investors for OVIS. I am trying to get a public count of all known shares in public hands to confirm what I suspect.
================================================

Date: Sat, 09 Aug 1997 20:52:35 -0400

At 06:26 PM 8/9/97 +0000, you wrote:
>I may be so brash,exactly who are you?I am a self employed construction
>worker in upstate NY,I trade in all my spare time and I do make money.I
>love the business and am looking forward to doing it full time in a
>couple of years.I don't want to get personal but I would like to know
>where you are coming from,like have you ever done this before? Thanks
>Pal,I'll let you know when I get more OVIS this week,looking forward to
>your response

I am a retired NYPD Police Officer. I retired on a medical disability (broken neck) some seven years ago. I am also a professional actor, TV-Show consultant and avid stock investor. My money has been made in the market and some from the acting and other things that I do, besides that some of the investors of OVIS know me from the AOL boards.

Some of my past hits were the following:
Buy of 10,000 shares of BTIM at 4 and sold a few months later at 25 to 28.
Buy of 10,000 shares of RESI at 3 to 4 and sold at 38 to 40 a few months later.
Shorted SYQT for 20,000 shares at 13 and covered less than 20 minutes later at 7.
================================

Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 23:42:25 -0400
Subject: OVIS: A question and answer

At 09:55 PM 8/11/97 -0500, you wrote:
>How does this work? Does all the price run up have to come from the
shorts covering, or does public and us have to come in to buy more?

I have decided to keep the cartel list confidential as per the email that I have received.
-----

Now regarding a short squeeze, it is a combination of both shorts and more buyers coming into the stock. The run up would look like this.

1. You have shorts covering, this causes the price to rise. Sharp raises in price attract the day traders, and those who hear about the possibilities of major money to be made.
2. You have day traders coming in and they buy and sell large volumes during the day or days. A lot of them like to free ride (Buy and sell in the same day.). In the mean time they add greatly to the increase in volume and price increase, as the shorts have to compete with day traders buying.
3. This feeds back to number one. As the shorts and day traders bid for shares to buy the price of the stock raises to met the demand to buy.

----
This same story also works in reverse. And that's what happened the first time. OVIS was hit with bad times. Blood was spilled and the sharks moved in for the kill. But this company did not die, it fought back and appears to have has made a turn around. And given the low public float and alleged large naked and regular short position in the stock. The tides have turned and we hold the cards.

Remember that there is strength in numbers. If we act as a team and make a team effort rather than just thinking of ME, ME , ME. Then we will all make a large profit from OVIS during and after a short squeeze.
I suspect that there my be some weak links in our cartel, but this is true with all groups. I only hope that the weak links can see the rewards of working with everyone else here and not sell early.



To: Ellen who wrote (6966)10/21/1997 2:05:00 PM
From: Riley G  Respond to of 55532
 
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 09:17:30 -0500
Subject: Ovis Cartel

Riley, I appreciate very much that you have been gracious enough to post a couple e-mails to SI for me. Frankly, prior to OVIS, I felt no compulsion to join SI, and now I must wait two weeks to post there.

There have been some speculation on this and other threads that the Cartel is in some way illegally manipulating a price. I would like to dispel that rumor. Legislation under the Securities and Exchange Act was directed at Sindicates (not cartels). Their destructive practice was to accumulate based on insider information, shared through a network of good ol' boys that were privileged bankers, ceos and the like who withheld information from the public if it suited them in their accumulation phase, and then distributed into weak hands.

That illegal practice has nothing to do with grass roots enthusiasm for a stock, sharing of public information and opinion and certificate calling. Don't be so nervous people. The Ovis Cartel's actions are virtually the OPPOSITE of the actions of a syndicate. Can the paranoia. Every armchair lawyer in SI land wants to sound like a personal friend of the SEC.

I was looking for a historical precedent, and though I haven't compiled a massive list of successful squeezes, (no time) I like the example of Northern Pacific. Overvalued at 110, it shot up to one thousand dollars, a bears worst nightmare. What is most interesting, is that after the squeeze, it didn't tank back to or below it's pre-squeeze price, and didn't fall below three hundred. In terms of dollars per share this is a massive increase, in terms of percentage gain, it is only an extra thousand percent or so, oh well. Ovis is a different animal of course, actually more ripe for growth than an over valued large cap. Many would like to scoff Ovis faithfuls hopes of large gains, but they fail to realize that these situations are common in the generalities of remarkable companies. This is exactly how small companies become big companies. Watch it happen. Better yet, come on board.



To: Ellen who wrote (6966)10/21/1997 2:06:00 PM
From: Riley G  Respond to of 55532
 
Thanks for your interest in the RMIL shareholder cartel.

On August 22, at around noon the cartel dropped the hammer and started calling in certs for there stocks. This happened when several Market Markers were banding together to drop the bottom out of the stock.

We as shareholders MUST all call for the stock certs as this will force the estimated 2 to 5 million shorts to cover their positions.

for further information read the messages by Riley G at:
siliconinvestor.com



To: Ellen who wrote (6966)10/21/1997 2:07:00 PM
From: sandshark  Respond to of 55532
 
That's what I said.