SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cirrus who wrote (51141)10/11/2008 10:53:01 PM
From: Ann Corrigan1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224691
 
Give me a break--double standard thy name is Democrat. Ms Jamieson is director of an Annenberg Pub Policy Center. Obama distributed Annenberg millions for Bill Ayers--of course it's a coincidence:

Posted by: Pejman Yousefzadeh

October 11, 2008

Once again, I condemn inflammatory comments directed at any Presidential or Vice Presidential candidate by anyone at any rally. But someone really needs to clue Kathleen Hall Jamieson in on something:

But Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania an author of 15 books on politics, says the vitriol [against Obama] has been encouraged by inflammatory words from the stage.

"Red-meat rhetoric elicits emotional responses in those already disposed by ads using words such as 'dangerous' 'dishonorable' and 'risky' to believe that the country would be endangered by election of the opposing candidate," she said.

First of all, the overwhelming majority of people who appear in McCain-Palin rallies are respectful and the very opposite of boorish. Secondly, where was Jamieson's handwringing when Obama and Biden said that McCain was "dishonorable" or "erratic"? Why wasn't this "red-meat rhetoric" condemned so vociferously.

I am looking for a reason other than "John McCain has an 'R' next to his name" for an answer to this question.

redstate.com