SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Andeveron who wrote (41146)10/11/2008 2:33:29 PM
From: prometheus1976  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217901
 
You're talking a return to the Stone Age.The world was on a gold standard of some sort for most of the last 1000 years( until about 35 years ago).The world functioned o.k. usually.

Except in the most dire local disasters,gold served as a medium of exchange,a store of value,and a facilitator of trade.

The question is basically,"Which system is more stable and preferred, fiat currency or a precious metals system,or a whiskey system,or a tobacco system ,or a wampum system?"

Taken a step further the question is" A fiat currency or a convertible currency with safeguards"

Both systems have their drawbacks,but i don't know of anyone in history who was wiped out because they had too much gold.i do know of many who were financially decimated because they had none.
Regards,P1976



To: Andeveron who wrote (41146)10/11/2008 5:42:37 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217901
 
by this post you are correct by premise

yes, gold is certainly meant for the optimists amongst us

pessimists hoard canned food and guns

that may be necessary where you are

in hong kong, i am figuring gold will do, and keep doing