Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (425287)	10/13/2008 1:10:11 AM
From: bentway	Respond to of 1575001

Ten, what do YOU think is the proper level of coverage for the Obama/Ayers "relationship"? I think it's far less close than the McCain/Keating relationship was, and less damning. I'm not aware that Ayers and Obama ever hung out socially, or went on trips together, as Keating and McCain did - on Keating's jet and dime.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (425287)	10/13/2008 10:06:22 AM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575001

>Lots of evidence, but the latest example is their coverage of McCain's attacks on the Obama-Ayers relationship. They spent so much time portraying Ayers as a model citizen for his local community, they were absolutely perplexed as to why Republicans would even go after him. Only a brief mention of Ayers' past with Weather Underground, and absolutely no mention of Ayers being unrepentant of his terrorist past. Because the Ayers story is stupid and there's no there there! >That's no secret, but if FOXNews is "Fix News," what does that make CBS who zealously ran "fake but true" memos from Abilene, TX? They thought they had a scoop and they ran with it. It happens. I don't think that proves anything. >The only "proof" the professor provided was a link to the sponsors of that ad. If it isn't true, then the professor shouldn't be saying it. It certainly is suspicious, though. -Z