Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Naked Shorting-Hedge Fund & Market Maker manipulation? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (3931)	10/13/2008 2:26:31 PM
From: basserdan	3 Recommendations Respond to of 5034

Broad Tossers? A Cook’s Tour? Overstock.com Settles With Gradient LAW BLOG WSJ.com on law and business and the business of law. Posted by Jennifer Forsyth October 13, 2008, 1:40 pm Long before John Mack and Dick Fuld thought short sellers were destroying every company, Patrick Byrne thought short sellers were destroying his, aided by the research firm Gradient Analytics. In 2005, Mr. Byrne, Overstock.com’s founder and president, claimed that Gradient’s negative reports on the online retailer drove down the stock and benefited short sellers. Here’s the CNN/Money story. Byrne, after issuing a series of blistering criticisms of Gradient, sued in Marin County Superior Court in California, alleging libel, unfair business practices and tortious interference. Here’s Byrne in full cry from February, 2008: “These broad-tossers have given us a two-and-a-half year cook’s tour of the California appellate process. They engage in such legal posturing because they know this case will expose a widespread, illegal Wall Street practice that harms American companies and makes money at the expense of American investors. I look forward to the day when the scofflaws are no longer in a backroom seeing their orthodoxies supped by biddable regulators and tractable New York financial journalists, but are instead sitting in a California courtroom trying to rationalize their schemes to twelve citizens.” [LB NB: The reference to a “cook’s tour of the California appellate process” likely refers to the anti-SLAPP suit that Gradient brought against Overstock last year. California’s anti-SLAPP statute is designed to allow for the dismissal of lawsuits that attempt to silence legitimate speech. Click here, here and here for prior posts on the anti-SLAPP statute, starring Britney, Borat and Ethan Hawke. As for Byrne’s last bit about tractable journos, we take no offense.] When last we heard from Gradient Analytics, the firm was “looking forward” to the upcoming jury trials, saying it welcomed the opportunity for a jury “to reject the unsupported theories” espoused by Byrne. Seems Gradient decided a jury trial wasn’t the best route after all. Today Overstock.com issued a news release saying the company had settled all claims against Gradient. In it, Gradient had to back off on at least one point. Overstock quotes a statement from Gradient as follows: “Having reviewed all SEC filings, relevant accounting literature, and all other information available to it, Gradient now believes that, to the best of its knowledge, Overstock’s stated accounting policies did in fact conform with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and regrets any prior statements to the contrary.” The terms of the settlement were not disclosed. blogs.wsj.com