Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (426094)	10/14/2008 4:07:45 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572868

Thanks David. Didn't feel like wasting time trying to demolish another CJ "nuance." He'll just keep coming up with more ... Tenchusatsu

To: i-node who wrote (426094)	10/14/2008 4:09:40 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572868

"You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the issue." Not really. "Voter registration is designed to prevent voter fraud." It certainly is part of the process. But, by its nature, it isn't foolproof. So there are going to be fraudulent registrations. No way to help it. "If the democrats will illegally register voters, they will illegally use them to steal an election." Proof, i-node. Proof. Again, the DOJ has been going all out on this for years. How many prosecutions for voter fraud have been filed over the past few years? The full mechanism of the government is behind this. If it is at all common, there should be hundreds of cases that have turned up. No conspiracy is air tight. You have no proof that the first and second clause in your sentence have any connection. "You don't turn your head to registration fraud, particularly when it is induced by one of the candidates as this was." Now you are claiming Obama is responsible? How so?