Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (426757)	10/15/2008 4:21:53 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574707

Z, > How are they equivalent, other than that religion says they are? You can explain away any sin as a "scientifically natural thing." Why should teaching that homosexuality is OK be part of a public school curriculum? If it's about increasing tolerance, there are other ways to do that besides pushing one point of view over another. > Who's pushing atheism? Hint... teaching science is not the same as teaching atheism. You have come out in favor of "religion-free zones," thinking that's perfectly acceptable, legal, and Constitutional. You have also defended the teaching of homosexuality in public schools as a "scientifically natural thing." In other words, you are trying to make this into an issue of "science vs. mythology." Yet you won't answer to the double-standard you hold. Cause to the self-appointed defenders of tolerance, the only thing that should be "tolerated" is their own point-of-view. Tenchusatsu