SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (427051)10/16/2008 10:22:57 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575761
 
"That is, of course the problem -- you couldn't count on anyone to be rational."

Which is why we had WWIII...

It worked. For good reason. When more than one power has nuclear weapons, the only hope of more than a Pyrrhic victory is the eliminate your opponent in a first strike that totally eliminates their ability to hit back. That was impossible for the USSR to do to the US since soon after WWII, they would have never been able to get all of our bases.



To: i-node who wrote (427051)10/16/2008 1:13:52 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575761
 
"that Castro was totally ready to throw it all away just to have the US be hit with nuclear weapons."

Considering the Bay of Pigs, I think Castro was seeking nuclear deterrent to invasion from the superpower 90 miles away. That's what he ended up with, without even needing the missiles. Well played, Mr. Castro!