SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (427089)10/16/2008 1:18:33 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576164
 
Iran certainly had realized that they need not fear any retribution from the Carter administration and that made it clear to the Middle East that the United States would not defend itself, let alone anyone else. Had Reagan not changed the dynamic -- radically --

Iran contra?



To: i-node who wrote (427089)10/16/2008 1:36:31 PM
From: bentway2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576164
 
"Had Reagan not changed the dynamic"

Yeah, Reagan really changed the "dynamic"! Before he was even elected he traded guns for hostages with Iran. Then, obviously part of his secret, election winning deal with them, he didn't touch them for eight years!



To: i-node who wrote (427089)10/17/2008 10:26:18 AM
From: tejek1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1576164
 
There is no way to overstate the damage Carter did to our nation in four short years. Without question, the worst president in our lifetimes, other than maybe LBJ (it is a close call as to who was worse).

You are a real loon. Do you think anyone but the radical right believes that Carter was a worse president than Bush? Who do you listen to that causes you to believe such crap?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News