To: daveinmarinca who wrote (2120 ) 10/17/2008 12:09:19 AM From: Anchan Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7833 So... Gold and silver there is, at the very least 16 m lbs AuEq (at 0.70 g cut-off), possibly much more, certainly enough for a major to jump in gladly -- but at what point? * Further assays coming up; two weeks? * Drilling continues. "Once the remaining assays from the drill program are received, an independent assay bias study will be completed as part of an overall assay QA/QC study for the Chesapeake drill program." Does this mean that, once they have calculated the assay bias, they can infer (NI 43-101 compliant?) grades from Cambior's old drilling results? * Process metallurgy is "difficult". * Roasting preferred over bio-leaching. I know nuttin' (=nuttin'!) but read under miningreview.com (which also explains the term "preg-robbing") that bio-leaching, generally speaking, is more environment-friendly. Might the preference for roasting affect permitting? If I read right, the roasting option will produce lots of high-value sulphuric acid. * Profits from co-products Zn and sulphuric acid will lower processing/operation costs considerably (enormously?). * What are the next steps? NI 43-101 Preliminary Assessment in 2009, OK. Then a prefeas? The CKG website says "During the last year [...] Chesapeake’s focus was to update Cambior’s 1997 pre-feasibility study." Does this mean that such an updated PFS, including the new drill results for both Main and North zones and including the independent assay bias study , will be submitted rather soon? And then towards a bankable FS? Or whatwhowhenhow? * How much cash do they have? How much cash do they churn through? We are holding we are holding cross the waters cross the sea