SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jet.Screamer who wrote (158039)10/17/2008 12:02:53 PM
From: Jim McMannisRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
What percent of households are going to get a tax cut?
Is this before or after the Bush tax cuts are added back in?



To: Jet.Screamer who wrote (158039)10/17/2008 12:05:23 PM
From: John KoligmanRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Federal tax rates were as high as in the 90%+ range in the 1950's, down to the 70%+ range when Kennedy cut them in the early 1960's, and then the 28%+ range under Reagan, (keep in mind somehow our economy seemed to do just fine in the 1950's with these 'confiscatory' <ggg> tax rates. Perhaps Phil Gramm would have still been around if he had changed his comments and directed them at 'the rich private equity 15% tax paying whiners'... Of course how could he do that with his cushy UBS banking job <ggg>...

Regards,
John



To: Jet.Screamer who wrote (158039)10/17/2008 12:08:02 PM
From: Jim McMannisRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
RE:"Obama did not single him out, he asked Obama a question and Obama answered it"

Obama picked him. Lot's of people wanted to ask questions.

Just who pays taxes...

taxfoundation.org