SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pompsander who wrote (24051)10/17/2008 1:01:27 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 25737
 
How Bad Can It Get for McCain?

by Steve Kornacki | October 17, 2008
observer.com

No one on John McCain’s team will ever admit this (before the election, at least), but his campaign is rapidly curling up into the political fetal position.

Two weeks ago, they stopped seriously contesting Michigan, once a promising and electoral-vote-rich target that Democrats have carried for four straight elections. This week, they added Wisconsin and Maine – two more traditionally blue bastions – to that list. That leaves Pennsylvania and Minnesota as the only two blue states that McCain is now actively seeking to win over, but his polling numbers in both of those states have collapsed in the past two weeks.

At the same time, McCain is redoubling his efforts in traditionally Republican states like North Carolina – last carried by a Democrat in 1976 – and Virginia, a shoo-in for the G.O.P. since 1964. His campaign schedule over the next few days will take him to those two states as well as Ohio and Florida – a combined 75 electoral votes that were crucial to George W. Bush’s victories in 2000 and 2004. Obama will be in Virginia and North Carolina in the next few days, too, as well as Missouri, yet another normally Republican state where McCain is now – at best – running dead even with his opponent.

McCain’s defensive crouch – protecting his party’s traditional turf and giving up on winning over the other side’s – calls to mind the final days of Bob Dole’s doomed 1996 bid, when the former Kansas senator found himself campaigning in South Dakota, which hadn’t (and still hasn’t) voted for a Democrat since Lyndon Johnson in ’64, and a host of other G.O.P. redoubts.

The Dole forces recognized that beating Clinton was out of the question – it had been for some time – and rearranged the candidate’s schedule (and resource allocation) in those final days in order to shore up his support in wavering Republican states. The purpose was two-fold: To spare Dole the historical indignity of suffering a thorough, McGovern-Mondale-type thrashing, and to prop up down-ballot Republican candidates who were vulnerable to the Democratic tide being generated at the top of the ticket. (In South Dakota, for instance, three-term G.O.P. Senator Larry Pressler ended up losing to challenger Tim Johnson by two points.)

Of course, the Dole folks never formally acknowledged their damage-containment strategy, and they mixed obligatory visits to California and other battleground states into his schedule to give the appearance of an offensive-minded campaign. But his final week also included stops in Arizona, Texas, Louisiana, Missouri and other states he would never have been spending time in had the national race been remotely winnable. In the end, Dole took 159 electoral votes – not much worse than George H.W. Bush in 1992 – and kept Clinton (barely) under 50 percent of the national popular vote. Rallying the depressed Republican base in the closing days of that race probably spared him a much worse beating.

It should go without saying that, as in the final days of the ’96 campaign, some dramatic, unforeseen development could still change the trajectory of this race. Stranger things have happened – although not in modern presidential politics. In ’96, Republicans held out hope that a then emerging fund-raising scandal – the one that would, long after the election, prompt Vice President Al Gore to invoke his notorious “no controlling legal authority” defense – might metastasize and sink Clinton, just as some Republicans now wishfully hope that Bill Ayers or Jeremiah Wright or maybe even Joe the Plumber will prompt a late rethinking of Obama by the electorate. So McCain, like Dole (who, with the exception of a few naps and “hygiene breaks,” campaigned nonstop for the final 96 hours of the ’96 race), will press on aggressively, hammering away at his opponent, claiming that the polls are moving in his direction, and predicting an upset victory.

But the better question now isn’t “Can he still win?” but rather “How bad can it get?”

By any reasonable estimate, Obama is now favored to win significantly more than 270 electoral votes. All of the states that voted for John Kerry in 2004 – 252 electoral votes between them – are now firmly in Obama’s column. (The closest is probably New Hampshire, where polls put Obama ahead by about 8 points, on average). Add to those states Iowa, Colorado, New Mexico and Virginia, Bush states where Obama has now opened consistent and statistically significant leads, and Obama’s electoral vote total hits 286. As of now (again, barring a dramatic change of trajectory) this probably represents the worst-case scenario for Obama – and the best case for McCain.

But it will almost certainly get worse – maybe much worse – than that. Obama has, in the past few weeks, opened a clear lead in Florida and smaller leads in Ohio, North Carolina, Missouri and Nevada – red states that account for a combined 78 electoral votes. And he’s within a few points in Indiana (11 electoral votes), West Virginia (5), North Dakota (3) and – maybe – Montana (3), red states all. (He’s also competitive in at least one Congressional district in Nebraska, where electoral votes are awarded by district, and both Obama and McCain are now expending resources there.)

If Obama were to hit each one of these targets, he would secure 387 electoral votes – the best number for a Democrat since L.B.J. massacred Barry Goldwater. It’s hard to imagine an Obama landslide getting much worse than that, although theoretically Georgia (13), Kentucky (8) and Arkansas (6) could come into play in an Obama perfect storm.

McCain’s campaign schedule, resource allocation, and even his debate rhetoric on Wednesday night (stridently anti-abortion, for instance) all suggest an effort to limit the number of red states that Obama can flip – not an all-out push to win over Democratic states. McCain does not want to be remembered as having waged the most disastrous Republican campaign since his Goldwater, his fellow Arizonan.

There’s also the issue of down-ballot damage. Twelve years ago, Dole lucked out because the country, having elected a Republican Congress in 1994 as a check on Clinton, had taken a favorable view of the idea of divided government. So the voters’ rejection of Dole didn’t trickle down to the Senate and House level, and the G.O.P.’s majorities went undisturbed.

The climate is different this year. No Democratic Senate incumbent is in trouble, and very few in the House are. The prospect of a 60-seat Senate majority and a two-dozen seat gain in the House for the Democrats grows by the day. Whether the Democrats hit those numbers will depend on races in red states like North Carolina, Mississippi, Kentucky and Georgia. Shoring up his standing in those states and ensuring that the G.O.P. base turns out could help McCain avoid being remembered as the G.O.P. nominee whose campaign resulted in a filibuster-proof Democratic stranglehold on Washington.

Barring the above-mentioned miracle, there are no longer any good scenarios for McCain. The question is how bad he will look in defeat.



To: pompsander who wrote (24051)10/17/2008 1:02:39 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 25737
 
SCENARIOS: How candidates are faring in key states

Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:51am EDT
reuters.com

(Reuters) - The presidential election hinges on a handful of battleground states where opinion polls show Democrat Barack Obama holding a significant lead on Republican rival John McCain.

Obama leads in all of the states won by Democrat John Kerry in 2004 as well as in several states won by Republican President George W. Bush, recent polls show.

Obama or McCain need 270 electoral votes to win the Electoral College and capture the White House in the November 4 election.

The president is determined not by the most votes nationally but by a majority of the Electoral College, which has 538 members allotted to all 50 states and the District of Columbia in proportion to their representation in Congress.

Each state except Maine and Nebraska awards its votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in the state. Maine and Nebraska split them by congressional district.

Here are some battleground states with their electoral vote totals, 2004 results and recent details about the contests in each state.

* Colorado -- Nine electoral votes. Bush beat Kerry 52 percent to 47 percent in the state in 2004 but since then Democrats have won the state legislature and governor's office. Two polls this week have given Obama leads of between 4 and 9 points, holding an advantage that opened as the financial crisis moved to center stage in the campaign.

* Florida -- 27 electoral votes. Bush beat Kerry 52 percent to 47 percent in a state known for the disputed result that decided the 2000 election. Florida is a classic swing state with a heavy concentration of older voters who could favor McCain. It also has many Jewish voters who are normally Democratic but have been wary of Obama. Three recent polls have all given Obama a 5-point edge, maintaining his persistent but sometimes narrow lead in a state that McCain must win to take the presidency.

* Indiana -- 11 electoral votes. Bush beat Kerry by 20 points in 2004 in a state that last voted for a Democrat in 1964. But it borders Obama's native Illinois and he has poured resources into his Indiana campaign after finishing a strong second to Sen. Hillary Clinton in the May Democratic primary. Republicans have begun to advertise there but polls have shown Obama closing the gap. The two most recent polls gave McCain leads of 5 and 7 points.

* Michigan -- 17 electoral votes. Kerry won by 3 points in 2004. The state's depressed economy and ailing manufacturing base make it a prime target for competing arguments on the economy, although McCain pulled out of Michigan earlier this month after Obama appeared to have secured an unassailable lead. A Tuesday poll had Obama up by 16 points.

* Missouri -- 11 electoral votes. Bush beat Kerry 53 percent to 46 percent in 2004 in a classic battleground with a mix of urban centers in Kansas City and St. Louis and conservative rural areas more aligned culturally with the South. The race looks tight, with a poll on Friday putting Obama ahead by 6 points and one on Wednesday showing McCain ahead by 1 point.

* New Hampshire -- Four electoral votes. Kerry beat Bush by 1 point in 2004. McCain's history of big primary wins in New Hampshire in 2000 and this year gives him hope he can take the state in November. Democrats captured both the state's seats in Congress and gained control of the state legislature in 2006 in an anti-Republican wave on which Obama hopes to capitalize. Three polls last week show Obama leading by 8 to 13 points.

* New Mexico -- Five electoral votes. Bush beat Kerry by fewer than 6,000 votes in 2004. As the senator from neighboring Arizona, McCain is familiar to many New Mexico voters but will have to battle Obama for the growing bloc of Hispanics, who make up more than 40 percent of the state's population. Four recent polls put Obama ahead by 5 to 8 points.

* Nevada -- Five electoral votes. Bush beat Kerry by 20,000 votes in 2004 in a state won by Republicans in eight of the past 10 presidential elections. As in New Mexico, the burgeoning Hispanic population will be crucial -- it now makes up nearly a quarter of Nevada's residents. A poll Wednesday gave Obama a 3-point lead.

* North Carolina -- 15 electoral votes. Bush beat Kerry by 12 points in 2004 even though the Democratic vice presidential nominee, John Edwards, was from the state. But more than a fifth of the population is black and an influx of transplants to high-tech urban areas like Charlotte and the Research Triangle of Raleigh, Durham and Chapel Hill has given Obama a chance. Most recent polls show North Carolina essentially even although one survey Saturday had McCain ahead by 2 points and another Wednesday had Obama up by 2 points.

* Ohio -- 20 electoral votes. Bush beat Kerry by about 120,000 votes in the state that ultimately decided the 2004 race. No Republican has won the White House without Ohio and McCain will have a hard time piecing together a win without the state. A Thursday poll said candidates were tied in the state with 49 percent apiece, although two other recent surveys put Obama ahead by 2 and 5 points.

* Pennsylvania -- 21 electoral votes. Kerry beat Bush 51 percent to 48 percent in 2004 but Pennsylvania is one of a handful of states won by Kerry where McCain's camp had seen a chance to reverse the result. The most recent poll showed Obama up by 16 points, the latest in a string of surveys that have given him a double-digit lead in the state.

* Virginia -- 13 electoral votes. Bush won fairly easily by 9 points in 2004 in a state that has not gone Democratic in a presidential election since 1964. But Virginia's trend has been toward Democrats in recent state elections amid dramatic growth in the Democratic-leaning northern suburbs of Washington, D.C. A Thursday poll gave Obama a 6-point advantage while one on Wednesday had him ahead by 10 points.

* Wisconsin -- 10 electoral votes. Kerry won by 11,000 votes out of more than 3 million in 2004 but Obama has held a lead for months in a state where he crushed Hillary Clinton in a February Democratic primary showdown. A Tuesday poll put Obama ahead by 17 points.

(Writing by John Whitesides; Editing by Eric Beech)

© Thomson Reuters 2008 All rights reserved