Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (427539)	10/17/2008 4:16:52 PM
From: HPilot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584985

You can discuss capitalistic economics all you want. But when you say you are taxing the well to do and spread the wealth around that's not capitalism, its socialism.

To: tejek who wrote (427539)	10/17/2008 4:48:01 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584985

you got it all wrong and for ideological reasons. On this we will have to agree to disagree. Btw, clinton taxes sopped up all that money floating around and didnt violate supply side at all--it enhanced it. Clinton and the NDC was the last effective supply side admin. After that bush mucked it up to the point, the ideology became unrecognizable. Guys like Kudlow are todays reactionaries and unless you can get over the fixation on the deficit, your balanced budget fervor will make you so too, albeit from another angle. There are times for supply side and there are times for demand side. This is time for krugonomics.