Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (90574)	10/18/2008 4:24:50 PM
From: Cogito	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 541695

>>I thought of you as I watched last night's 20/20, John Stossel's politically incorrect politics. One of his points about government regulation is that it's always aimed at solving ancient problems, which is regulations fatal flaw.<< Karen - I didn't see the show, but I partially disagree on that point. I used the ancient example of ladies painting watch dials with radium only because it came to mind. It isn't even a particularly apt example, since it is true that nobody knew the dangers of radium at the time. Of course, even after the women began developing tumors on their lips and tongues, it took a long time before anything was done about it, but I won't wander. Working conditions in the factories and sweat shops of the Industrial Revolution and the period following it were, for the most part, horrific. Yes, safety regulations that exist today are in place, to some extent, because of that. Regulations are generally put in place following some sort of horrific accident, or after many horrific accidents. In that way they aren't really dealing with ancient history. They're dealing with recent history. But the reasons for having safety standards, and for enforcing them, haven't changed. It's not as if workplaces no longer present hazards. Has OSHA gone too far? Perhaps. So we should deal with that. But let's not just scrap it. The libertarian view is that somehow big corporations will correct unsafe working conditions, and other types of misbehavior such as polluting rivers, in response to market forces. I've never heard a convincing argument on how that would work, nor have I seen any historical evidence to support that notion. - Allen

To: Lane3 who wrote (90574)	10/21/2008 1:56:55 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 541695

I have that show recorded. I'm planning to watch it but haven't gotten around to it. Stossel is one of the relatively few people you will see on a major network's news or "news magazine" programs that often pushed a libertarian perspective. You get liberals, people trying for some sort of middle (between conservatives and liberals), a few conservatives, but libertarians who strongly argue libertarian ideas are few and far between.