To: slacker711 who wrote (81201 ) 10/20/2008 12:06:16 PM From: Rich Bloem 2 Recommendations Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 197798 Slacker, I don't think there is any doubt that the rate is substantially lower than previous. My guess is 40-50% lower. However, there is serious doubt as the whether this agreement provides lesser or greater value to Q. The other additives are substantial. For instance the 2.5 billion is really more like 4.8 billion on a DCF basis. The transferred patents are an unknown, but obviously Q thinks they are important and will either provide value. The ownership of essential GSM patents are not in doubt. One of the thinks that I see of great value is that NOK will now be paying royalties on GSM phones. We don't know what that rate is and it could be argued that it is zero. But, according to the press releases, NOK's agreement now covers GSM.ESPOO AND SAN DIEGO - July 23, 2008 - Nokia (NYSE: NOK) and Qualcomm (Nasdaq: QCOM) today announced that they have entered into a new agreement covering various standards including GSM, EDGE, CDMA, WCDMA, HSDPA, OFDM, WiMAX, LTE and other technologies. The agreement will result in settlement of all litigation between the companies, including the withdrawal by Nokia of its complaint to the European Commission. Under the terms of the new 15-year agreement, Nokia has been granted a license under all Qualcomm's patents for use in Nokia mobile devices and Nokia Siemens Networks infrastructure equipment. Further, Nokia has agreed not to use any of its patents directly against Qualcomm, enabling Qualcomm to integrate Nokia's technology into Qualcomm's chipsets. The financial structure of the settlement includes an up-front payment and on-going royalties payable to Qualcomm. Nokia has agreed to assign ownership of a number of patents to Qualcomm, including patents declared as essential to WCDMA, GSM and OFDMA. The specific terms are confidential.