SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (90885)10/20/2008 4:53:13 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541731
 
OK, so we all know that taxation without representation is a form of tyranny.

Yeah, but is it UNFAIR? <g>

At that point, the majority of Americans not paying taxes would elect leaders who decide how much the minority must fork over to the government — to be redistributed to the majority through government programs and services.

As you know, that's long been one of my gripes about universal single-payer health care. I had done a rough calculation of what the ratio might look like if we did health care and paid for it out of income tax. I came up with a number upwards of 80%, as I recall, who wouldn't be paying income tax. That's all but guaranteed to trigger an attack on the golden-egg laying goose.



To: TimF who wrote (90885)10/20/2008 8:39:46 PM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541731
 
>>At that point, the majority of Americans not paying taxes would elect leaders who decide how much the minority must fork over to the government — to be redistributed to the majority through government programs and services.<<

Tim -

I see the point Cliff May is trying to make there, but there's no reason to assume that everyone below a specific income point will always vote as a block. In fact, there's plenty of evidence to demonstrate that it would not be so.

There's enough to be afraid of in the present without conjuring up ghosts of the future.

- Allen