SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (52511)10/21/2008 7:10:57 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Respond to of 224704
 
Here's a response to the post demonstrating Obama's reprimand to his liberal sheep in Miami. The following post shows many of empty O's supporters have an obnoxious view of their fellow Democrats:

>by Obaman, 10/21/08

Re: Obama's Mask Slips Today

He is clearly trying to communicate a message that he wants no part of the circus-like crowd...Obama has too much class and sophistication for such childish grandstanding. He is an intellectual with a vision for fixing this mess we are in...not pandering to the rally cries of undignified half-wits. The same ones who are repeat visitors to calls from the pulpit...try again!<



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (52511)10/21/2008 7:46:08 PM
From: Ann Corrigan1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224704
 
Why McCain is right on health care

Doug Holtz-Eakin, former Congressional Budget Director
October 21, 2008

Senior citizens of America: Your Medicare benefits are safe; the Democrat nominee for president is not. Health-care reform is one of the most important issues in this campaign, and voters deserve an honest discussion of the issue.

Unfortunately, despite pledging to campaign according to a "new type of politics," Barack Obama has adopted one of the oldest tricks in politics: Hide the truth about your own policies, attack the opponent. Let's review the facts.

Sen. Obama has recently launched one of the most dishonest and distorting ads in recent memory. The ad falsely claims that Senator McCain will "cut Medicare benefits" to pay for his health-care plan.

Apparently Sen. Obama is against eliminating Medicare fraud that allows criminals to make millions by charging for fake procedures, payment reforms that will provide coordinated and more effective care for our seniors, and new treatment models that will better manage chronic-care diseases. These are among the reforms that Sen. McCain has proposed for Medicare.

Not one senior will be dropped from the rolls. Not one cut will occur. Instead, seniors will receive higher quality care at lower cost and reduced premiums.

Another ad misleadingly accuses John McCain of taxing health insurance for the first time, leading to the largest middle-class tax increase in history. In reality, the tax code will subsidize -- not tax -- health insurance both before and after the McCain reforms.

It is true that the reform will make that subsidy more fair -- providing the same help to rich and poor regardless of the source of their insurance. This is a powerful way to reduce the number of uninsured, which is why even Sen. Obama's own economic policy adviser has advocated for a refundable tax credit like the one proposed by Sen. McCain. And there is no tax increase.

A final ad accuses Sen. McCain of sending the tax credit straight to insurance companies. American families can choose which policy best fits their family, and the insurance company that provides it. At that point, the funds will be transferred to the insurance company of their choice.

The flood of distorting ads is apparently intended to change the subject from Barack Obama's plan. He will mandate that parents cover their children and fine them if they don't. He will mandate employers provide the insurance Barack Obama dictates, or face a fine if they don't. He refuses to explain either fine, and his top health adviser recently told the Wall Street Journal that they have no plans to come clean before the election.

Barack Obama's plan will cause almost 50 million Americans to lose the health coverage they currently have. It has been estimated to cost more than $240 billion annually -- a financial burden of more than $3,000 per American family.

When the kids and employees are forced into the government-run plan, America will be closer to the government-run, single-payer health-care system Barack Obama has said he wished America had.

Health care reform is too important an issue to limit to 30 second sound-bites. But when a presidential candidates' plan does as much damage to the existing health-care system as Sen. Obama's, it's understandable why he would want to avoid talking about it.

Doug Holtz-Eakin is a former Congressional Budget Office director.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (52511)10/22/2008 1:19:31 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224704
 
Credit That Obama Calls A Tax Cut Will Be Of Zero Help To Economy

BY JACK KEMP AND PETER FERRARA

Posted 10/21/2008

Barack Obama says he supports a tax cut for 95% of all Americans. He is referring here to his proposal for a $500 refundable income-tax credit for all workers, except those in the top 5% of income earners.

These folks, for some reason, are to be singled out for "special treatment" — i.e., tax increases — unless, as he recently told ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos, "the economy remains weak."

So apparently even Obama recognizes that his tax increases would be economically harmful.

Because Obama's tax credit does not reduce marginal tax rates, it will not benefit the economy. It provides no added incentives for work, savings, investment or business expansion.

Because it's refundable (meaning workers get it even if they have little or no income-tax liability), for many it will involve just another check from the government, rather than a reduction in tax liability. In those cases, it would not be a tax cut at all, but a transfer payment and a direct drain on tax revenues.

McCain proposes to double the personal exemption for each dependent from $3,500 to $7,000, for all families regardless of income. For middle-class workers in the 25% tax bracket, this $3,500 increase would reduce their tax liability by $875 for each child. While this tax cut also does not involve a reduction in marginal tax rates, it will promote working families with children.

But McCain also proposes marginal tax-rate reductions that do promote economic growth and encourage investment. Because America today suffers from the second-highest corporate tax rates in the industrialized world, McCain would help restore American competitiveness by reducing the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 25%. This would benefit the middle class and workers by creating new jobs, at better wages, while strengthening the dollar.

It may even raise, rather than reduce, revenues. According to a 2007 study by the Treasury Department, Ireland — with a 12.5% corporate tax rate — raises almost 50% more revenue on a comparative basis than the United States does with a 35% rate.

McCain would also hold the top capital gains tax rate and dividend tax at 15%. Both would provide a much-needed boost for the value of stocks, which are now held by more than two-thirds of all Americans.

McCain further proposes to phase out the alternative minimum tax, which would otherwise burden 25 million middle-class families. This will save middle-class families $2,700 each year on average, an overall middle-class tax cut of $60 billion per year.

McCain's tax plan includes other provisions that would boost our economy, as well, including the expensing of new investment in equipment, machinery and technology.

Obama, by contrast, has proposed to raise marginal tax rates for almost every federal tax — the individual income tax, the capital gains tax, the dividends tax, the payroll tax, the death tax, etc. He would further increase corporate taxes through such measures as the windfall profits tax on oil companies.

These marginal tax rate increases would dramatically discourage savings, investment, business expansion and job creation. Such tax increases would consequently slow the economy even further and reduce jobs and wages for working people and the middle class, while simultaneously weakening the dollar.

Republicans should promote additional middle-class tax cuts through fundamental reform of our confusing, contradictory and confiscatory tax code. Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., proposes to allow workers to choose a flatter tax system with a standard deduction of $25,000 for couples ($12,500 for singles), plus a personal deduction of $3,500 per family member (exempting the first $39,000 for a family of four).

A 10% tax rate would then apply to the next $100,000 for couples ($50,000 for singles), with a 25% rate above that. Currently, a 15% tax rate starts at $15,650 for couples ($7,825 for singles), with a 25% rate starting at $63,700 for couples ($31,850 for singles).

Ryan's plan, which McCain has praised, would promote a powerful economic and investment boom, while creating jobs and good wages for millions.

Finally, the biggest middle-class tax cut of all would be allowing workers the freedom to choose personal accounts for Social Security, which McCain has also praised. These accounts should grow eventually to replace the entire payroll tax for those who choose them, with the accounts financing all the benefits now paid through the tax.

To the extent workers make this choice, this would eliminate payroll taxes on working people and the middle class, now the highest tax they pay. Instead, working people would be paying into their own personal store of family wealth, opening up broad new vistas of opportunity.