Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (91237)	10/22/2008 4:46:44 AM
From: thames_sider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541241

I'll leave you to search out those armed robbers appearing at the house of non-criminals in the UK, bursting down the doors, etc. Personally I don't worry over what doesn't really happen here. I don't wear a helmet against meteor strikes, either. But very very bored by this discussion, done it over and over, so won't be replying on it again. Iraq started the force when they invaded Kuwait. We overthrew that, and agreed to a cease fire, they also agreed to it. Don't follow the agreement and our agreement to not fire is also null and void. So Bush 2 invaded Iraq because Saddam Hussein - broke the ceasefire? invaded Kuwait again? I must have missed those events, so sorry. Remember this is what I was replying to: Hussein could have avoided the invasion by simply complying with the requests Bush made of him. He did not do that, so he, not Bush, is responsible for the invasion. (BTW for some reason I never see a mail when you reply to my posts. ?)