SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: alydar who wrote (64734)10/22/2008 11:36:35 AM
From: QwikSand  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
First of all, Ballmer is another Harvard graduate, unlike his pal Bill Gates, who dropped out of Harvard...although Ballmer did drop out of the Stanford MBA program. It's debatable whether anybody would call either of those two guys an "intellectual", whatever that means these days. Scott McNealy is also a Harvard grad and Stanford MBA. You're drawing distinctions between members of the same elite-private-school and Ivy-educated CEO club based not on scholarly work they may or may not have done, but rather on their perceived success at their jobs and how much you like their personal styles. Because "intellectually", all these guys mentioned above are peas in a pod. You don't even know what the word means. When you say "intellectual", you mean "snob". You mean "elitist", another word that's thrown around a ridiculous amount these days.

Schwartz is a wannabee intellectual but a highly genuine snob. In fact he's not an Ivy grad, having come out of the quite snooty but less prestigious "little Ivy" Wesleyan U in Connecticut before becoming a McKinsey consultant.

Bush is not in the same league as any of those guys. He got into Yale and Harvard the old-fashioned way (which was only a little different from the current way), i.e., not through merit or intellect but rather based on connections and coming from a "good family" (and by his own admission slept through most of his Yale experience except for the parties and football games.) Bush comes from one of America's most established political families and is most definitely a consummate elitist and a super snob. He is definitely not a guy who hobnobs with Joe the Plumber at back-yard barbecues even though that's what Karl Rove taught you to believe. It's just that, elitist or not, he's good enough at putting-on a phony home-spun front as a politician that he makes a lot of people comfortable enough to elect him president. We can see the result of eight years of that mess...it's falling in pieces all around us.

The anti-intellectualism you espouse is not new by any means, in the U.S. or in Europe. It's always been around but its Fox-News brainless ascendancy right now is another sad sign of an empire in decline.

What matters isn't whether people are "intellectual" or not. It's whether they're smart (not at all the same thing as "intellectual"), competent and, above all, honest.

--QS