SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VMware, Inc. (VMW) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (186)11/14/2008 10:07:49 PM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 358
 
VMware's Lofty Cloud Computing Goals

Former Microsoft executive Paul Maritz is now determined to turn his new employer, VMware, into a leader in cloud computing


November 13, 2008, 12:01AM EST

As the No. 3 executive at Microsoft, Paul Maritz presided over the company's Windows juggernaut, turned aside threats from Netscape and Sun Microsystems (JAVA), and pressed the company to embrace the Internet. Now, the longtime software executive is looking down Microsoft's barrel from the other end, trying to help his new employer, VMware (VMW), triumph where past Microsoft competitors fell short.

In his new role, Maritz is leading VMware's charge in the mounting battle over cloud computing, the trend that's leading companies to shift computing power away from their own machines and into the hands of tech powerhouses such as Microsoft (MSFT), Google (GOOG), Amazon.com (AMZN), and Salesforce.com (CRM). VMware wants to be a player in cloud computing, too, and Maritz, CEO since July, is undertaking a major engineering project to try to get there. "That says to Microsoft, 'We're coming right after you,'" says Jayson Noland, an analyst at Robert W. Baird who has a neutral rating on VMware.

VMware needs some victories. In less than a year, it has gone from hypergrowth business success story and stock market darling to a company whose slowing growth and plummeting shares led to the ouster (BusinessWeek.com, 7/8/08) of its former CEO and co-founder Diane Greene. Shares of VMware slumped 1.22, or 5%, to 22.42 on Nov. 12.

VMware held 2007's most successful initial public offering by specializing in virtualization software that helps companies cut costs by making more efficient use of their computers. Now, VMware needs to show customers and investors that it can move beyond virtualization and remain worthy of a chunk of companies' tight tech budgets while avoiding a competitive onslaught from Microsoft. "If VMware just coasts on its past achievements and lets Microsoft catch up, it will have a problem," says a former Microsoft executive, who asked not to be identified as he maintains ties to Maritz. "But I don't think you'll see them sit still."

Making His Mark

Maritz is on the move. "In technology, if you stand still, eventually your value proposition evaporates," he says, holding forth in a sunlit conference room at the company's Palo Alto (Calif.) headquarters. On Nov. 10, VMware announced it had bought the French company Trango Virtual Processors, moving it into the market for software that powers mobile phones. In late October the company launched its first advertising campaign, featuring customer testimonials. Even competitors say Maritz is already making his mark. "He's a great hire for VMware," says Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce.com. "He understands where VMware should go."

Next stop: an ambitious project called the "Virtual Data Center Operating System," a complex piece of software that promises to help companies make their IT operations even more efficient by acting as a traffic cop among their hundreds of servers, disk drives, networking devices, and applications. VMware has hundreds of engineers working on the system, scheduled to make its debut next year. It's designed to position VMware as a technology "platform" for cloud computing, around which other companies could add capabilities and build their own businesses. "VMware is one of the few companies in the industry that can aspire to have a platform," Maritz says. "There will be three or four credible players in that marketplace, and we plan to be one of them."

When Maritz was the highest-ranking Microsoft executive behind Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer, he was known for an intellectual, deliberate style that helped fend off competition while mediating between warring factions at Microsoft. "Paul is not one of those Ballmer types who says, 'We're going to destroy and gut them,'" says Tod Nielsen, CEO of Borland Software (BORL), who spent 12 years at Microsoft in the '80s and '90s. "He likes to be behind the scenes."

One area where Maritz excelled was turning Microsoft's products into platforms, which made those products all the more indispensable to customers. "The more people can do on your platform, the more they want to use it," says Michael Cherry, an analyst at consulting company Directions on Microsoft. The same could hold true at VMware. "They have elements that can define the next computing platform," Nielsen says. "That's what Paul loves."

A Leader in Philanthropy

Maritz, 53, was born and raised in Zimbabwe, where he still maintains a ranch; he was educated in South Africa. Since leaving Microsoft in 2000 after 14 years, he's been involved in philanthropic projects and is chairman of the Grameen Foundation, which makes microloans mainly to poor women in Africa, and stems from the work of Nobel Peace Prize winner Muhammad Yunus. This year, Maritz took a job at EMC (EMC), which owns most of VMware's stock and controls virtually all of its voting rights and board, after EMC bought Pi, a startup Maritz had headed.

Near the end of Maritz's Microsoft tenure, tensions were mounting. Executives Brad Silverberg and Jim Allchin were fighting over how quickly to embrace the Web and possibly imperil the company's desktop dominance, and Maritz was under pressure from Gates and Ballmer to settle the dispute, according to Nielsen. Meanwhile, he was called as a witness in the government's landmark antitrust case against the company. "His life was not fun," says Nielsen. "We had a couple of hard years trying to find our way through all the bad news." Maritz won't talk about his Microsoft tenure, but Nielsen and others say he left on good terms and stuck to his guns by developing the company's Web-oriented .Net products.

Microsoft isn't the dominant company today that it was in the '90s, but it's running on new fuel since Maritz left. It has pulled out an old weapon against VMware, folding similar features of its software into Windows, and giving them away free to customers that buy server versions of the operating system. Analysts say the competition will likely cut into VMware's pricing power and market share; Wall Street expects the company's sales this year to rise 42%, to $1.88 billion (BusinessWeek.com, 10/21/08), vs. 88% growth in 2007.

Meanwhile, Microsoft is making its own cloud computing push, developing software called Windows Azure (BusinessWeek.com, 10/28/08) that covers some of the same ground VMware aspires to conquer. Mike Neil, Microsoft's general manager of virtualization, dismisses a threat from VMware, calling the company's cloud computing initiatives "a branding exercise."

A Cloud Advantage?

Maritz acknowledges Microsoft's clout. "I have a deep appreciation for what Microsoft is and what they can do," he says. Yet he sees an opening for VMware's cloud platform as an alternative for companies that don't want to limit themselves to writing Windows software, for example by working with Linux and other open-source software.

Maritz could face a tough task assembling an ecosystem of developers around VMware, partly because introducing a new software platform that hardware and software companies need to support will cost them extra development time—a scarce resource at a time when industry profits are under pressure. "If Maritz gives me yet another derivative [operating system], I will roll my eyes," says Steve Mills, the senior vice-president in charge of IBM's (IBM) software group.

Maritz hasn't wielded his tech-industry prowess on as important a battlefield in eight years. The computer industry is watching to see whether he still carries as big a stick.

Ricadela is a writer for BusinessWeek.com in Silicon Valley.

businessweek.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (186)1/20/2009 6:49:39 AM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 358
 
...people with knowledge of Cisco’s plans said it would sell a server bundled with networking hardware and virtualization software from both Cisco and VMware.

Cisco Plans Big Push Into Server Market

By ASHLEE VANCE

January 20, 2009

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Within the next few months, Cisco Systems, the largest maker of networking equipment, plans to release a product that threatens to shake up the technology industry and put the company on a collision course with traditional partners like Hewlett-Packard and I.B.M.

The product — a server computer equipped with sophisticated virtualization software — is a bold but risky move by Cisco into an unfamiliar, intensely competitive market that typically produces far lower profits than Cisco makes from network gear. But it reflects the company’s ambition to grow beyond its roots as the so-called plumber of the Internet to offer everything from instant messaging software to digital stereos.

For years, Cisco remained content to sell the switches and routers that direct the rivers of data flowing between computing systems. It dominates that market, making most of its $40 billion a year in revenue, and 65 percent gross profit margins, from such products.

The other major makers of computer hardware, including H.P., I.B.M. and Dell, have enjoyed a mutually beneficial relationship with the company, which is based in San Jose, Calif.: Cisco sells networking gear, while they sell personal computers, servers, storage systems and software.

Industry experts say that Cisco’s push into the server market will disrupt that comfortable symbiosis and could cause an all-out war among the tech titans for one another’s customers.

“This will be the most important and most talked-about product of the year,” said Brent Bracelin, a hardware analyst for Pacific Crest Securities. “There will be massive competitive reactions from both I.B.M. and H.P., and we expect this will lead to a new wave of industry consolidation.”

Cisco executives played down the potential for serious conflict. “We see this not as a new market, but a market transition,” said Padmasree Warrior, the company’s chief technology officer. “Any time there is a major transition occurring, there will be large companies that have to compete in some areas.”

The technology driver behind this transition, according to Cisco, is virtualization software.

Over the last decade, virtualization software has experienced a meteoric rise. Virtualization products let companies run numerous business applications, rather than just one, on each physical server, allowing them to save electricity and get more out of their hardware purchases.

Recently, however, virtualization technology has started to have a more significant impact on business computing systems as a whole. New tools developed by VMware, the market leader, make it possible to shuffle business applications around a data center just by pointing a computer mouse at an icon on the screen. The mobility of the software has broken some of the traditional, linear connections among computers, storage systems and networking hardware.

As a result, companies like Cisco see an opportunity to produce a new, potentially disruptive class of hardware and software management systems that span an entire data center. With customers looking to manage their data centers as a single entity rather than separate units, the world’s largest technology companies must now fight to secure the most prominent, central position possible.

Cisco’s newfound aspirations stretch well beyond the $50 billion server market to include management software and possibly even storage.

“Our vision is, how do we virtualize the entire data center?” Ms. Warrior said. “It is not about a single product. We will have a series of products that enable us to make that transition.”

Cisco could show off the first of its new systems as early as March. The company would not disclose the exact nature of the product, although people with knowledge of Cisco’s plans said it would sell a server bundled with networking hardware and virtualization software from both Cisco and VMware.

Rather than working as a general purpose system, the Cisco product will cater just to virtual applications. (Cisco owns close to 2 percent of VMware, a public company that is majority-owned by EMC, a maker of computer storage systems.)

Cisco’s diversification into the server market is fraught with risk. Cisco boasts gross profit margins of close to 65 percent, while companies selling basic servers tend toward gross margins closer to 25 percent on those products.

Ms. Warrior maintained that by bundling various hardware components with software, Cisco would earn higher profits than are typical for servers. But Wall Street remains skeptical.

“It will certainly be a challenge for Cisco to get the new products to the same margin levels as its current products,” an analyst with Signal Hill, Erik Suppiger, said.

At best, analysts estimate, Cisco could obtain 50 percent gross margins with the server product. Such a figure, combined with Cisco’s probable modest start in this new business, would not affect its bottom line in the near term. Eventually, however, Mr. Suppiger and others say the move could lower Cisco’s overall profitability and change how investors view the company.

Perhaps more significant over the long term is the alteration of Cisco’s relationship with its longtime allies.

Mr. Bracelin expects I.B.M. and H.P. to consider acquiring networking start-ups and begin developing products similar to Cisco’s forthcoming system. They are also likely to direct business to other networking companies, like Juniper Networks and Brocade.

However, Cisco may have little choice other than to invade its rivals’ turf. Its core business is slowing, and for the company to meet Wall Street’s demands for growth, it must look to new lines of business.

Besides, its competitors are eyeing Cisco’s lucrative networking business for themselves. When Carleton S. Fiorina was chief executive of H.P., she sat on Cisco’s board, and her executive team encouraged H.P.’s sales force to promote Cisco products ahead of H.P.’s own ProCurve networking gear.

Under H.P.’s chief executive, Mark Hurd, that strategy ended. H.P. has made ProCurve a crucial piece of its growth strategy, priding itself on undercutting Cisco’s prices. With gross margins of close to 50 percent, ProCurve stands as one of H.P.’s most profitable businesses, second only to printer ink.

I.B.M., meanwhile, has long had a strong relationship with Brocade around storage networking products, and I.B.M.’s labs are working on their own networking hardware projects.

H.P. and I.B.M. declined to comment for this article.

Cisco dismisses the suggestion that it is fomenting war with longtime partners. The company is merely adjusting to a change in technology, and the other companies will do so as well, according to Ms. Warrior.

Cisco already battles Microsoft, another longtime partner, in the market for collaboration software that helps workers communicate on projects. In addition, Cisco sees opportunities in the consumer realm, playing off the home networking products it acquired through the purchases of Linksys and the set-top box maker Scientific Atlanta.

With close to $27 billion in cash on hand, Cisco could buy its way deeper into the data center as well, perhaps through an acquisition of VMware or even all of EMC, analysts say.

“Everybody is trying to get to the same point in the future,” said James Staten, an analyst at the research firm Forrester. “It’s inevitable that as they all get larger, they start crossing over into each others’ territory more and more.”

Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company

nytimes.com