SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Valuepro who wrote (61918)10/24/2008 6:31:01 PM
From: tyc:>  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78410
 
>>- i.e., wealth (100 dollars + 400 dollars in loans), yet only the first 100 dollar deposit exists to support the total indicated wealth of 500 dollars

I not sure* I agree with your suggestion that $100 deposit allows the creation of $500, the original $100 plus $400 of "paper".

My understanding is that the original $100 deposit allows the lending of only (say) $80. However that $80 loan remains in the banking system because it is redeposited after use, and thus becomes another deposit which allows another loan of something less. Each deposit is the equal of the other.

*(Come to think of it, I'm not sure of anything anymore, except that I am often wrong).



To: Valuepro who wrote (61918)10/24/2008 6:42:54 PM
From: benwood  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78410
 
You've created the simple transaction to prove your point about the zero sum game, but that is just the inside transaction of a much larger picture. The stocks are assets held by many, often primarily as a byproduct of credit, so as the asset values decline, the zero sum game shows that people passed around the dollars, but at some point because of declining asset prices, margin calls or loan calls are made and dollars are used to cancel out debts. Voila, the dollars have gone into the same vapor from whence they came.

So to combat that and to reward the friends who created the deflationary (deleveraging) cycle, money is printed up and handed to them, and the new debt is held by the public.

So in exchange for private wealth which evaporated, we get public debt. Nice trick. And along with the game of shifting wealth around, just a few gigantic preferred banks emerge ready to rule the country, er, Wall Street.



To: Valuepro who wrote (61918)10/25/2008 1:01:51 PM
From: LLCF  Respond to of 78410
 
The problem comes when you borrow against the alleged value of something... i.e. everyone but a few of us nutcases. :))

DAK