SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold & Gold Stock Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pogohere who wrote (15817)10/26/2008 8:15:17 AM
From: Don Earl1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29622
 
RE: "How will we know when there is a change in monetary velocity?"

Watch the Fed's currency swaps and movement in the Yen and Euro.

The Fed has been doing these swaps in an effort to prop up the USD -- on the order of $1 trillion in the last month.

I think it's a fair assumption that it would be unnecessary for the Fed to engage in these swaps if it had any meaningful amount of either currency on hand. The slow death of the USD over the past several years has most likely exhausted any supply of foreign currencies needed to enter the market to defend the dollar.

The massive drop against the Yen on Friday would suggest the Fed just used up its latest supply of that currency. At least if one assumes a 10% drop in the stock market, on grim economic news, is something other than a logical reason to load up on the Yen at .5% interest.

The USD is still going up against the Euro, which would suggest the Fed still has some Euros left from the recent swaps. I guess the question there is how long the EU will continue to hold and accept the massive influx of dollars. Eventually, the merry-go-round has to stop and the ride comes to an end. When it does, the overhang of dollars is orders of magnitude worse than it was.

Resistance is at around .85 dollars for Euros. I may be wrong, but I sincerely doubt it will break out. My take is the big slide will start from there and crash through the .63 support level like a ton of bricks. 2-3 weeks to the failed breakout move and 2 months or so to the break in support. Food riots within 12-18 months.



To: pogohere who wrote (15817)10/26/2008 9:28:58 PM
From: pogohere  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29622
 
BEIJING (AFP) — World leaders have vowed to overhaul the global financial system in the face of recession fears, but US President George W. Bush urged nations to "recommit" to free markets despite economic turmoil.

After a week of growing economic gloom and plunging stock markets, Asian and European leaders meeting in Beijing promised Saturday wide-ranging reforms while UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon also called for quick change.

"Leaders pledged to undertake effective and comprehensive reform of the international monetary and financial systems," the 40-member Asia Europe Meeting (ASEM) said in a statement released late Friday.

"They agreed to take quickly appropriate initiatives in this respect, in consultation with all stakeholders and the relevant international financial institutions."

China's Premier Wen Jiabao called for more regulation of the world's financial system , saying after the summit "we need to draw lessons from this crisis."

"We need financial innovation to serve the economy better, however we need even more financial regulation to ensure financial safety."

Wen confirmed China's participation in a crucial summit in the United States on November 15 aimed at tackling the financial meltdown, without specifying which Chinese leader would attend the meeting of 20 industrialised and emerging powers.

The economic turmoil has led to growing criticism of US-style free market capitalism, with French President Nicolas Sarkozy earlier this week saying "the ideology of the dictatorship of the market... is dead."

But Bush on Saturday, moving to set an agenda for the upcoming international economic summit, said its participants must "recommit" to the principles of free enterprise and free trade.

"As we focus on responses to our short-term challenges, our nations must also recommit to the fundamentals of long-term economic growth -- free markets, free enterprise, and free trade," Bush said in his weekly radio address.

The US president, who leaves office in January, added that "open market policies have lifted standards of living and helped millions of people around the world escape the grip of poverty."

Ban said the Washington meet must address the need for change and joined chief executives of key UN institutions in calling for considered but large-scale reforms.

"The market and regulatory failures that have led to this crisis must be addressed as a matter of urgency," a joint statement said.

"We reaffirm the need for meaningful, comprehensive and well-coordinated reform of the international financial system and pledge our support to this end."

afp.google.com



To: pogohere who wrote (15817)11/2/2008 10:45:01 PM
From: pogohere  Respond to of 29622
 
Velocity slows precipitously:

"Where are we in this rapidly unfolding crisis for the financial system and the global economy? The housing bubble has burst. The heavily leveraged and derivative-releveraged exposure of the banking system to bad real-estate loans had, by early October, totally frozen the global financial system to a point at which banks refused to lend to each other, let alone to their customers. The financial crisis has fed back onto the real economy via a collapse in equity markets and attendant, massive wealth losses that have frozen credit to, and spending by, households and firms. Policymakers have responded with massive injections of liquidity into the banking system followed by some injections of capital into the banks by national treasuries. The banks have reluctantly begun to lend modest amounts to each other but so far have shown no sign of any willingness to lend to others and, therefore, continue to fail as financial intermediaries. The damage already inflicted on global balance sheets and the real economy is substantial.

The global collapse of housing prices and equity markets has erased about $25 trillion from global wealth. About half of that loss has come in the United States alone, and before the fall in asset prices is over (perhaps by late next year), the losses will probably approach $40 trillion, with U.S. losses coming to well over a year's income--about $15 trillion. There will be no sprightly economic bounce after such massive wealth losses, as households restrain consumption to pay interest on large stocks of debt that were accumulated during the bubble. Deleveraging by banks for the same reason has severely restricted the supply of credit to all but those who do not need it--that is, those who have not used it during the credit-driven boom.



[Trying to reverse the slow down in velocity:]

Avoiding deflation may require more aggressive measures--specifically, having the Fed print money and directly inject the funds into the economy by purchasing long-term government bonds used in turn to finance programs of government spending and capital injections into the banking system. The Fed has not yet reached that stage, but it is approaching it rapidly.


Today's credit crunch is not exogenous like the one imposed by Carter, but endogenous, imposed by a collapse in the housing market, numerous financial failures, and an intense need for banks to deleverage, which translates into a virtual cessation of credit supply to the economy. Such an endogenous credit crunch is even more virulent than government-imposed credit controls that can be lifted promptly when the economy collapses, as it did in 1980. Beyond that, American households are substantially more indebted relative to income today than they were in 1980. Few American households contemplate the purchase of a home, a car, or a major consumer durable good without using credit. The sudden unavailability of credit has caused consumption to drop sharply, falling probably at a 3 percent annual rate in the third quarter, and will possibly lead to a steeper drop in the fourth quarter.


[that old slow velocity problem again:]

The second danger from deflation is its self-reinforcing nature. As prices fall, the attractiveness of holding cash rises. As people attempt to enhance their holdings of cash by further reducing their spending, prices fall further, and the demand for cash rises more. Deflation intensifies. Such a deflationary death spiral must be avoided at all costs.


The acute need among banks to reduce leverage is collapsing the money multiplier so rapidly that the money supply is barely increasing even as the central banks engineer massive increases in the monetary base. (Money growth is the percent change in the money multiplier plus the percent change in the monetary base.) Simultaneously, the demand for money, in the forms of currency and (insured) bank deposits, is surging. Excess demand for money results in selling of commodities and risky financial assets along with elevated saving flows--all of which are deflationary.

The right model for central banks today is a sharply accelerated version of the Bank of Japan's path from 2001 to 2003 to a zero interest rate policy accompanied by direct purchases of long-term government bonds, mortgage-backed bonds, and equities. Printing money to directly support asset prices contained Japan's deflation and eventually reversed it by 2003. Today, a rapid onset of severe, incipient global deflation requires that the major central banks undertake an aggressive program of direct asset purchases to break the accelerating adverse feedback loop before further wealth destruction and more intense economic contraction usher in a global depression as devastating as the one that occurred in the 1930s.[emphasis added]

aei.org

Kind of reminds a guy of that scene in the Pythons "The Holy Grail:" bring out your toxic waste and worthless assets and the Fed will monetize them.

uk.youtube.com