Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (23158)	10/26/2008 4:59:21 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

The sun is currently blank of sunspots. The monthly numbers are not. The numbers on those charts are monthly averages, and they are based on a formula. You are the one who keeps making statements implying that the cycle is going to stop for some unknown reason. Now you are weaseling to try and change that to just a low cycle. Please just concisely state what you really, once and for all expect: A low cycle (how low) or no cycle? PS: I don't accept any of your nonsensical calculations, and no, it is not going to get colder over the next two or three decades, because as I keep pointing out to you, the increase in GHG forcings are larger in magnitude than the decrease in solar forcings EVEN is we got a Maunder type solar minimum, for which we have no reason to expect one in the next few cycles.