Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (23161)	10/26/2008 6:50:07 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Woah!! Not that low Neo. More like the 1880s to 1930s which averaged more like the 72 I have specified. <so you are on record as expecting something like the two cycles in the early 1800's?? > Heck, if we go as low as the 1812 level, that would really be a sudden drop in the trend. The subsequent one could well go that low. And the following one too. Hydrogen burns fast, but not that fast. It takes a while for the subduction processes on Sol to move material around to the cooking zone. I suppose the processes are more like convection than subduction, but I'm trying to give you an idea of the processes and times involved. The sun is quite large but quite mobile due to being a hot plasma of nuclear fusion on the boil. Mqurice