SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (143635)10/27/2008 11:34:13 PM
From: Land Shark1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
>there are no TOU violations on the "hockey threads"....

Whatever happened to your good buddy jimbob thompson?



To: jlallen who wrote (143635)10/27/2008 11:46:02 PM
From: Land Shark  Respond to of 173976
 
Could McCain lose his home state?
By MIKE ALLEN | 10/25/08 10:49 PM EDT

Democrats are circulating a poll showing Sen. John McCain losing ground in his home state of Arizona, an ominous sign for his beleaguered campaign as state after state turns blue.

Project New West, which aims to build the Democratic Party in the Intermountain West, says the Republican leads Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) in the Grand Canyon State, 48 percent to 44 percent.

The pollsters call that a “dramatic shift” from a survey they took in mid-September, which had McCain ahead by 14 points, 54 percent to 40 percent.

“Bad News for McCain: Presidential Contest in Arizona has Closed in Arizona And McCain Now Leads By Just 4 Points,” says a memo from pollsters Andrew Myers of Myers Research and Strategic Services and Lisa Grove of Grove Research.

The poll of 600 likely Arizona voters was taken Thursday and Friday, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

McCain has represented Arizona in the House or Senate since 1982.

In 2000, President Bush won Arizona by 6 percentage points. In 2004, he widened that to 11 percentage points.

Most polling has showed McCain winning his home state easily. The Real Clear Politics average of Arizona polls gives McCain an 11.3-point advantage over Obama.

The McCain campaign did not respond to requests for comment.



To: jlallen who wrote (143635)10/27/2008 11:57:19 PM
From: Land Shark  Respond to of 173976
 
Sarah Palin, ultimate reality TV star

Overconfident, smug, convinced of her superiority -- the vice-presidential candidate doesn't belong in the White House; she belongs on basic cable.

Oct. 27, 2008 | Americans seem to agree that confidence is a good thing, a healthy part of that pop-psych cure-all, self-esteem. "It is confidence in our bodies, minds, and spirits that allows us to keep looking for new adventures, new directions to grow in, and new lessons to learn,” writes Oprah Winfrey on O magazine's Web site. In the Huffington Post, Deepak Chopra recently declared that confidence is the No. 1 factor in maintaining the world’s economic health. But can too much confidence be harmful? Definitely.

The reigning queen of overreaching these days is Sarah Palin. As we all know by now, her inability to name newspapers, her refusal to answer tough questions during the vice-presidential debate and her substitution of smug attitude for a grasp of the facts have never been issues for her core supporters, in light of her charismatic bluster, snippy wit and stunning stage presence. Politicians have distorted the facts and lied for centuries, but Palin may represent a new high (or low, depending on your perspective). Her bravado in the face of contrary evidence -- say, when a Troopergate investigation found that she abused her power as governor and yet she boldly proclaimed herself "cleared of any wrongdoing" -- is something we might expect from rappers, motivational speakers and reality TV stars. As Palin's rise suggests, the key to American success isn't happiness -- it's confidence. "Fake it till you make it" may not be the U.S. motto, but it could be a runner-up.

Take all the hype out of today's American culture and you'll have next to nothing left -- just some experimental poet locked in a broom closet somewhere with no Internet. Rhonda Byrne's bestselling book "The Secret," for instance, has encouraged millions of down-in-the-mouth Americans to "create their own reality" by eliminating all negative thoughts (like self-doubt), based on the harebrained theory that good attracts good. Huge rap stars like Jay-Z, Kanye West, T.I. and many before them have turned cockiness and shameless self-promotion into an industry copied by wannabe M.C.s worldwide. But perhaps nowhere are the rewards for emphasizing style over substance higher than on TV. Pasta-maker infomercials and home-shopping networks give us a model for selling anything, including ourselves. Hulk Hogan defends his right to oil up his daughter. Donald Trump will fire your ass if you don't defend your right to be his apprentice, no matter what.

In an era of YouTube and 24-hour news cycles, nationally known politicians nowadays pretty much qualify as reality TV stars, so it doesn't seem incongruous for someone like Sarah Palin to put on the same incredible displays of arrogance that have defined the genre. The vice-presidential candidate would be right at home among the overconfident dingbats of reality TV -- "The Real World," "Survivor," "Rock of Love," "Big Brother" or whichever ones you bother with. Ever since Richard Hatch won "Survivor" with his scheming arrogance, ever since Omarosa became a household name by stabbing fellow competitors in the back with an icy smile on her face, reality TV has been defined by calculating villains with more swagger than actual talent. These days, programs are entirely based around overconfidence as a selling point. "The Pickup Artist," which recently began its second season on VH1, is hosted by a top-shelf breed of egotist in the form of Mystery, a Canadian illusionist born Erik Von Markovik who, with help from Neil Strauss' book "The Game," has turned hitting on women into a douche bag science. He has stuffed his (chain) wallet by hawking the truism that confidence is a turn-on in and of itself, a more important ingredient in success with the ladies than good looks, money or, God forbid, charm.
Alt Text

Over on Bravo, this season's "Project Runway" seemed to be editing all of its contestants' footage in order to make everyone sound like Marie Antoinette. Perhaps the producers wanted to recapture the magic of last year's winner, the pixieish Christian Siriano, whose barbs made him an audience favorite. Most of the individual interviews throughout the season made it seem as if a producer had just asked, “What's the most arrogant thing you could say about your own work, and the bitchiest comment you could make about someone else's?" Similarly, the girls on "America's Next Top Model's" 11th cycle have gotten into a little culture clash because the French model-in-training, Marjorie, and her uptight ally, Aline, refuse to play the confidence game, even while her housemates insist that the only way to succeed is to show confidence despite any shortcomings. The greater your shortcomings, apparently, the more confidence you need, often in the attempt to argue with viewers that your faults don't count -- a move typical of Palin's defenders, who think that anyone who criticizes her is just a hater. Marjorie has broken down in tears and admitted failure more than once, but she has won more challenges than her competitors. For her, confidence doesn't count so much as refining her performance. And there's a lesson in that.

Perhaps we've become so inured to all the posturing in rap and reality TV that now, when politicians show us the same type of empty swagger, we simply accept what they're serving, and even cheer them on. Last weekend, "Saturday Night Live" presumably hoped to embarrass Palin by writing an over-the-top, boastful rhyme about her and having her "decline" to perform it on the show's Weekend Update. But despite the bizarre Alaskan fantasia the show created, replete with fake show, pretend Eskimos and Amy Poehler shooting a guy in a moose costume with an imaginary handgun, Palin didn't look particularly uncomfortable or out of place swaying along to the beat or raising the roof when Poehler shouted, "All the mavericks in the house put your hands up!" Anyone who expected Poehler's performance to rival Stephen Colbert's skewering and roasting of George W. Bush at the White House Correspondents' Association dinner or even Chevy Chase's klutzy Gerald Ford impression must have been deeply disappointed. In order for the satire to have a real effect, Palin's discomfort needed to be palpable and make the audience squirm. Instead, the surge in "SNL's" ratings only amped up her star power.

The truth is, Palin would make a kick-ass reality star. "I think she could have her own show," Lorne Michaels recently told Entertainment Weekly. And according to a recent piece in the Hollywood Reporter, some TV execs have already started contemplating her exit strategy. With any luck, her schedule will free up, and she can start taping in early November.



To: jlallen who wrote (143635)10/28/2008 6:27:01 AM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Obama's Education Groups Funded Controversial Organizations in the '90s, Tax Returns Show
Barack Obama's boards gave tens of thousands to ACORN and more than $1 million to racially charged organizations, a study of tax returns shows.
By Maxim Lott

The Annenberg Challenge and the Woods Fund of Chicago funded numerous controversial groups while Barack Obama served on their boards between 1995 and 2002, an analysis of their tax returns shows.

In 2001, when Obama was a part-time director of The Woods Fund of Chicago, it gave $75,000 to ACORN, the voter registration group now under investigation for voter fraud in 12 states.

The Woods Fund also gave $6,000 to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church of Christ, which Obama attended. The reason for the donation to the church is unclear -- it is simply listed as "for special purposes" in the group's IRS tax form.

It gave a further $60,000 to the Children and Family Justice Center at Northwestern University, which was founded and run by Bernardine Dohrn, the wife of domestic terrorist William Ayers and, with her husband, a former member of the 1960s radical group the Weather Underground.

Other controversial donations that year included $50,000 to the Small Schools Network -- which was founded by Ayers and run by Michael Klonsky, a friend of Ayers' and the former chairman of the Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist), an offshoot of the 1960s radical group Students for a Democratic Society -- and $40,000 to the Arab American Action Network, which critics have accused of being anti-Semitic.

The Woods Fund did not respond to questions about the funding.

When Obama co-chaired the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which calls itself "a public-private partnership improving education for 1.5 million urban and rural public school students," it gave to some of the same groups -- partnering with ACORN to manage funding for schools and giving over $1 million to the Small Schools Network.

It also gave nearly $1 million to a group called the South Shore African Village Collaborative, whose goals, according to Annenberg's archived Web site, are "to develop more collegial relationships between teachers and principals. Professional development topics include school leadership, team building, parent and community involvement, developing thematic units, instructional strategies, strategic planning, and distance learning and teleconferencing."

But the group mentions other goals in its grant application to the Annenberg Challenge:

"Our children need to understand the historical context of our struggles for liberation from those forces that seek to destroy us," one page of the application reads.

Click here to see the application.

Stanley Kurtz, a Senior Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, found the collaborative's original application when going through Annenberg's archives.

Asked to comment, Yvonne Williams-Kinnison, executive director of the collaborative's parent group, the Coalition for Improved Education in South Shore said, "I don't want to put more fuel on the fire. You can call us back after the election.... I don't want to compromise the position."

Late Afrocentrist scholars Jacob Carruthers and Asa Hilliard were both invited to give SSAVC teachers a training session, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge noted in a report, adding that the "consciousness raising session ... received rave reviews, and has prepared the way for the curriculum readiness survey session."

But Carruthers has been a controversial figure because of inflammatory statements he made in writing.

"The submission to Western civilization and its most outstanding offspring, American civilization, is, in reality, surrender to white supremacy," Carruthers wrote in his 1999 book, "Intellectual Warfare." "Some of us have chosen to reject the culture of our oppressors and recover our disrupted ancestral culture."

In the book, he compared the process of blacks assimilating into American culture with rape.

"We may not be able to get our virginity back after the rape, but we do not have to marry the rapist," Carruthers said.

Hilliard has come under fire for advocating what many consider an extreme Afrocentric curriculum.

He selected the articles for the "African-American Baseline Essays" published in 1987 and first used in the Portland, Ore., school district. The essays have been criticized for claiming, among other things, that ancient Egyptians were the first to discover manned flight and the theory of evolution.

An Obama spokesman called investigation of these ties "pathetic."

"This is another pathetic attempt by FOX News to distract voters from the economic challenges facing this nation by patching together tenuous links to smear Barack Obama," Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt told FOXNews.com.

"The Annenberg Challenge was a bipartisan organization dedicated to improving the performance of students and teachers in Chicago Public Schools that was funded by a Republican philanthropist who was friends with President Reagan and launched by Republican Gov. Jim Edgar."

But Kurtz says those founders of the Annenberg Challenge would not have known the details about to whom their Chicago office -- one of 18 around the country -- was giving money.

"If you read Ayers' proposal to Annenberg, it doesn't sound radical. But if you actually read Ayers' education writings, they are very radical indeed," Kurtz said. "Ayers, like so many other savvy professors, knows enough not to state his actual views frankly when applying for money. But you can find the truth in his writings."

The controversial donations make up only a small portion of the overall amount doled out by the Annenberg and Woods funds. The Woods Fund gave over $3.5 million to 115 different groups in 2001, and the Annenberg Chellenge dispensed nearly $11 million to 63 groups at its height in 1999.

Most of the groups are mainstream and well respected, ranging from the Jazz Institute of Chicago to the Successful Schools Project.

But Kurtz says that this should not obscure what he describes as controversial donations.

"If John McCain had given to white supremacist groups and people said, 'Hey, the majority of funding didn't go to supremacist groups' -- that wouldn't even cut the ice," Kurtz said.

"I feel certain [Obama] knew about these radical groups," Kurtz said. "We know that he read the applications because he made statements about the quality of proposals."

elections.foxnews.com



To: jlallen who wrote (143635)10/28/2008 4:43:52 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Why are you such a weenie and afraid to write the words you're trying to use...you need some spelling help??? Being a weenie is a characteristic of a conservative...