SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Hat Trick Beverages -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scion who wrote (2)10/28/2008 6:51:20 PM
From: scion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5
 
Hat Trick Beverages (HKBV) - SEC Letter to HKBV: 01 Oct 08

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT
Roger Paszarnant
Branch Chief

Direct Dial: (202) 5514979
Facsimile: (202) 772-9230
VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
COPY VIA TELECOPIER 866-455-6270
October 1, 2008

Garr Winters
Hat Trick Beverages Inc.
2325 Hurontario St.,
Suite 170 Mississauga,
ON L5A 4K4 Canada

Dear Mr. Winters:

I respond to your faxed letter dated September 30, 2008. I will not comment about your characterizations of our communications that tend to minimize the seriousness of this situation, but will focus on facts.

The staff is concerned that Hat Trick may have disseminated materially false information to the public. We seek to resolve this issue immediately to help ensure that innocent investors are not being harmed by reliance on false and misleading information.

More specifically, Hat Trick issued at least three public statements regarding a contract with two Arizona supermarket chains_ First, on September 3, 2008, Hat Trick issued a public statement titled "Hat Trick Beverages (HKBV) in over 500 new retail locations" which included the following statements:

a. ts cold beverage division has picked up a major and a significant new distribution in the State of Arizona."

b. "The Company, working with its Arizona distributor, Pinnacle Distributing, has just achieved listings in a total of over 500 new store locations."

c. The Company's Pumped Fitness beverage . _ will now be available in Hi Health Stores, an upscale grocery chain, as well as Fry's, an important mid-market grocery chain."

d. "Hat Trick Beverage CEO, Sender Vaiser commented; 'This is a significant win.
These are strong, mid-sized retailers and they are demonstrating faith in the product concept.

e. "The issuer expects, and projects its initial order of 20,000 cases to begin filling
the retail pipeline with product, in September with up to 250,000 cases of anticipated fulfillment"

f. "The entire contract has a face value of $3,900,000.00 to the issuer.

Second, on September 23, 2008, Hat Trick issued a public statement titled "Hat Trick Beverages (HKBV) Completes Initial Orders With 52 Hi Health Stores" which included the following statement:

"Hat Trick Beverages Inc. (1-11CBV.PK) is pleased to announce that it has received initial orders from Hi Health a 52 store chains (sic]."

Third, on or about September 26, 2008, Hat Trick issued a public statement dated September 25, 2008 and titled "Hat Trick Beverages (HKBV) Confirmation Of Previous News Release Transaction With Hi Health" which included the following statements:

a. "The issuer is using this filing to denounce such rumors, and affirm the validity of the agreement."

b. "The issuer hat (sic] Trick Beverages affirms and confirms to its shareholders that this contract in fact exists and is in a good and valid state."

c. "the buyer's name at Hi Health (which contract is the target of the false rumor) is Mike Gleela."

Since Monday, the staff, in communications with you and Larry Twombly, has repeatedly asked for documentation to verify the existence of a "contract" or "agreement" between Hat Trick and Hi Health. The only information you have provided to date is what appears to be a Hat Trick product order form dated September 25, 2008 billed to Pinnacle Distributing. This document was publicly disclosed by Hat Trick on September 29 "as a true copy of the Hi Health initial purchase order." The only reference to Hi Health is a handwritten note which provides no indication of any contract or agreement regarding Hi Health. It appears to be an order for about 1,000 24-pack cases, not 20,000 cases as referenced in the September 3 announcement, Thus, the "purchase order" provides little support for Hat Trick's public statements.

You stated to Ms. Cain and me that, since last week, you have been trying to substantiate the existence of an agreement by Hi Health to sell Hat Trick products. You thus admit that this is an issue you have been investigating since prior to our contacting you on Monday. The inability of a Hat Trick officer and director to obtain substantiating information in this time frame exacerbates our concern about the information Hat Tick has provided to the public.

Moreover, the staff has contacted Hi-Health Supermart Corporation and Pinnacle Distributing and the information provided does not support the public statements made by Hat Trick. Knowledgeable representatives from both have stated that Hi Health has made no commitment to buy Hat Trick products. In addition, Larry Twombly stated to the staff that Hat Trick's announcements contained inaccuracies--most importantly that there was no direct agreement between Hat Trick and Hi Health.

Finally, repeated messages left for Sender Vaiser have gone unanswered. The staff has been provided with a variety of inconsistent reasons about why he has been unable to contact us, including two from you -- first, that he was busy trying to get information about the Hi Health agreement and, second, that he has been at a trade show. Given the seriousness of the situation, I think it reasonable that the staff expect to hear promptly from the president of a public company who is quoted directly in some of the company's announcements at issue.

Again, evidence obtained by the staff to date indicates that Hat Trick public statements may be materially false. We request that Hat Trick substantiate the claims made it its public statements regarding Hi Health and Fry's by Monday, October 6, 2008. If Hat Trick cannot establish the existence of a valid contract or agreement by Hi Health and Fry's to carry Hat Tick's products, the staff may have no choice but to conclude that the statements are false and will proceed accordingly.

Sincerely,
Roger Paszarnant



To: scion who wrote (2)10/28/2008 6:52:05 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 5
 
Hat Trick Beverages (HKBV) Response to SEC Trading Suspension

TORONTO, October 28, 2008 -- hattrickdrinks.com (Pink Sheets: HKBV) Hat Trick Beverages is making the following statement regarding the recent trading suspension imposed by the SEC.

The Company stands by its news release in question and given another opportunity would not have done things otherwise. The company also categorically denies the following statement made by the SEC and denounces the same. "the company is disseminating materially false information to the public".

The company intends to file all correspondences relating to this matter on Pink Sheets including the original complaint received from the SEC and its replies, so to allow the reader to formulate their own decision if in fact anything the company released to the public justifies such a claim.

The Company believes that the SEC over reacted in their decision. Needless to speculate in doing so it is the management's view that our shareholders may possibly suffer a potentially severe impairment of their investment. The company intends to do everything in its power to minimize the same. The company verily believes that the SEC contacted, the food chain and distributor of Hat Trick regarding amongst other things the validity of a contract between Hi-Health and Hat Trick Beverages. To quote:

"We are concerned that the company is disseminating materially false information to the public and want to talk to you [Hat Trick] about that as soon as possible".

The Company responded twice in writing, in a timely fashion to the SEC (see filing on Pink Sheets) which is self explanatory. The company's position is, and remains so that at the time when investors would have made enquiries, it is likely that the only employee familiar with the product, or our Company name, was the specific buyer. This continues to be the case, and will probably only change once the product is on store shelves, and is entered on the Hi Health database of products.

Additionally, Pinnacle Distributing responded in writing with confirmation of the order. The company believed that the proof furnished to the SEC by the company was good and valid and more than sufficient to dismiss these unfounded allegations. The Company also believed that the SEC may still make further inquiries just to make sure, and rightfully so, however if any further questions surfaced the company would be contacted in any event to answer the same.

The company is advised that the investigator from the SEC repeatedly contacted Hat Trick's distributor to investigate further and challenge the validity of the information provided. Again the management saw this as a routine process of the SEC and that the matter would soon be over and dealt with. The company also stood by its beliefs that if any other questions should arise the SEC would contact the company in any event.

The company was advised that both the Distributor and possibly the client having received excessive inquiries into this matter, simply choose the path of least resistance. They subsequently severed all relations with Hat Trick Beverages. The tone and demeanor of the SEC from the onset is evident from the very first call and letters received from them was well documented.

This, in and of itself, will resulted in a loss of revenue for the Company, and actually contrary to investors' best interests. The subsequent trading suspension simply magnifies the negative impact on investors and all concerned.

The Italian merger has also received a set back with the Italian company evaluating their next move. The company will also scale down or even suspend their aspirations of expanding its hot drink division into USA via franchising model. The franchising laws and subsequently the required State filing of the UFOC is designed for unaccredited investors and an unfair label and tag on the company claiming (sic) the company is disseminating materially false information to the public, no matter how untrue and unfounded simply does not sit well in the UFOC disclosure documents.

The Company intends to continue to operate under 'a business as usual' policy, and is confident that this matter will be satisfactorily resolved to the benefit of its shareholders. Immediately the company will retain an SEC qualified law firm to address this matter with the SEC and intends to seek a retraction of this decision which in the company's view is simply noting more than an overreaction by the regulators, acting under undue pressure.

Again this is worth repeating, the Company will be uploading all of the relevant documentation to the Pink Sheets, so that the reader may Draw their own conclusions if in fact anything inappropriate was done by the company, as ultimately the company intends to return to the trading status, and intends to do so with clean hands.

The company firmly stands by its position and the press release announced.

CONTACT: corporate@hattrickdrinks.com SOURCE Hat Trick Beverages, Inc.

- - - - -