Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.B.C. who wrote (56513)	10/28/2008 9:41:33 PM
From: SmoothSail	Respond to of 57110

Ya think? Since ABC is her home, she will no doubt see that item. Hmmmm. Makes you wonder what goes on in the privacy of the voting booth. Minus $17,000,000 vs. plus $9,000,000. Quite a swing. Would she willingly donate $17 million if asked? Keyword is willingly. Saw that this thread is on the most popular thread list today.

To: J.B.C. who wrote (56513)	10/28/2008 10:32:33 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

Oprah has these homes: -42 acres in Montecito California -Lavallette, NJ -Apartment in Chicago -Property on Maui Her home in Montecito cost $50M. And that's before the remodel. And she doesn't even have kids. she could relieve the tax burden of a bunch of people really easily. Hell, she's a billionaire. Any billionaire that supports the government entitlement programs should give away 90% of their wealth to those entitlement programs and they would still be wealthy. Hell, oprah could sponsor her own economic stimulus package. She could give $3000 to 250,000 people and still have plenty leftover. This would cover the bailout costs for 250,000 people. I think I found a new project for rich liberals.