Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (431039)	10/29/2008 12:05:25 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572670

Al, > What's in his record to lead you to this conclusion? The so-called "moderate" positions he has are merely words. If you look at his voting record and his associations during his local community activism, he is about as liberal as they come. Powell, a recent endorser of Obama, said that leadership means sometimes pissing people off. I don't see much of that in Obama's political record, except when it comes to pissing off conservatives. Yeah a real "bipartisan" record there ... Tenchusatsu

To: Alighieri who wrote (431039)	10/29/2008 12:50:35 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572670

What's in his record to lead you to this conclusion? Do you have any examples of Obama's "bipartisan negotiation"? Certainly, McCain has a very long, established record on this. But Obama has never been bipartisan about anything in his life. If he couldn't support John Roberts, clearly the most qualified nominee in modern times, I don't see how you can argue the man is "bipartisan". Not supporting Roberts is the most partisan thing a Senator could have done. Not to mention being extreme.