Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (53468)	10/29/2008 12:59:19 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224691

Yup, this is one election already decided. No sense voting...

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (53468)	10/29/2008 1:13:53 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224691

Kenneth, if taxes go up on everyone, and spending continues to be out of control, and we know that Congress can't spend enough, will you argue that your taxes must be increased even more, (I know that will not happen because we already posted your post that stated you were voting for Obama because he is not going to raise your taxes)or will you finally stop protecting irresponsible spending?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (53468)	10/29/2008 5:33:26 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Respond to of 224691

Edit - Vote McCain

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (53468)	10/29/2008 5:49:06 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224691

Sen. Chuck Schumer tells us that Americans cannot afford anything other than complete one-party rule. Via CongressDaily: Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairman Charles Schumer of New York today argued that in the current climate a politically divided government is a bad thing. He was seeking to counter a closing GOP argument that voters should not give Democrats control of the White House, the House and a potentially filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. “They can’t win on domestic policy; they can’t win on foreign policy; they can’t win on sort of trying to tag our candidates; so the latest theme is, ‘Oh, let’s have some balance in government. Let’s have divided government,’ ” Schumer said at a press briefing. “Our view is very simple, and that is Republican senators, Republican incumbents aren’t for checks and balances. They’re for blocking change and backing [President] Bush.” The National Republican Senatorial Committee has made an argument against a filibuster-proof majority in a handful of its races, and the theme is making its way into some of the closing TV ads for Republican senators, particularly in North Carolina and Kentucky, which have long leaned to the right. In Kentucky, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney sent a fundraising appeal on behalf of Minority Leader McConnell arguing that should Democratic nominee Sen. Barack Obama be elected president, Republicans need to preserve some semblance of control in the Senate. “We believe Americans don’t agree with Democrats that one-party rule is OK,” said a NRSC spokeswoman. “If Democrats control all branches of government, there are no checks and balances, there’s no debate and Democrats are beholden to radical liberal special interests.” This is a “Kneel before Zod!” moment, people. michellemalkin.com