Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (144123)	10/29/2008 7:35:06 PM
From: Don Hurst	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

>>" Whichever one your doing, and whether your are doing so by mistake or because your arguing in bad faith, you should stop. "<< "You should stop" using the word "your" if you do not know how to use it correctly. And also, try learning the difference between "where" and "were". Then you can continue expounding the nonsense you do with correct grammar at least. Otherwise, you should stop.

To: TimF who wrote (144123)	10/29/2008 9:55:58 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

No, joined at the hip means that one does not happen without the other. If there are no taxes and no collective activities funded by said taxes (in whatever form), what is the point of living in society at all? If the collective we is no better than the individual we, why not just live in the woods alone? Obviously, we derive benefits from living in a group that is worth the cost and the aggravation. If we did not, there would be lots of people living the hermit life in the wilderness. One thing that should be crystal clear at this point is that the 'market' does not work properly unless it is regulated by the government. The market goes crazy and does itself in requiring the government to prop it back up so people do not go screaming into the streets. No, you are free to live in the woods by yourself without government. If you get more than 3 people in your group though, I hear that politics are inevitable. What constitutes big government? A % of GDP? The total number of people employed? The number of laws and regulations? What is the marker that says from this point on you have overly big government? I wish China had better laws and regulations governing its industry...I'll bet China wishes it had them as well.