Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (7241)	10/22/1997 2:01:00 AM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Subject: Yes we do have a commitment at this time I tried to tell people that the deal was very close to closing. Now I am telling you that the Short Squeeze is about to hit full force! Riley G -------- siliconinvestor.com To: Jeff Harrington (6908 ) From: Matty Dee Tuesday, Oct 21 1997 12:21PM EST Reply #6911 of 6911 Thank you, Jeff! Oh, just got this in the mail... my question was to Gary Morgan if they found a person to buy the 2.5 million shares. His response was: Yes we do have a commitment at this time. It is scheduled for closing on the 3rd of November, subject to no changes. We will announce it as soon as it takes place. The 2,5 million shares will be restricted 144 stock. Regards GRM Apparently, he found a buyer pretty quickly! I apologize, all. My bad. Matty Gregg

To: Pugs who wrote (7241)	10/22/1997 2:04:00 AM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Subject: RUMOR!!!!!!! Positive To: Riley G (6917 ) From: Tom R. Clarksburg Tuesday, Oct 21 1997 12:41PM EST Reply #6925 of 6930 RUMOR>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Riley just finished speaking with my broker friend at Everen Securities. Apparently, he just learned that another Everen broker, with discretion over his client accounts,just submitted a request for delivery of 950,000 shares of RMIL stock. This represents 65 of his clients. If true, that request should hit the new TA today. Regards TOM PS. CAVIAT.....this is what I heard and as of yet, unconfirmed.

To: Pugs who wrote (7241)	10/22/1997 2:04:00 AM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Subject: My response to the repeated NAYS. My response to the repeated NAYS. I have raised my selling range again. Riley G --- siliconinvestor.com To: Skeeter Bug (6902 ) From: Riley G Tuesday, Oct 21 1997 11:44AM EST Reply #6904 of 6905 READ ALL!!!!!!!! Skeeter Bug, I must admit that the nays have got me beat. I will sell 865 shares at $52.625 rather than the $35 to $45 range. I am sorry but I will be selling up the ladder from the 50's through the multi-hundreds now. You have converted me..... Here's how I plan to sell my shares through a slow steady upward process. Others may want to model a slow steady sell after this. I have no control of how you do it. As in all investments, this is only a template! Stock Price Sell percentage xx-xx 3% to 5% of position (cover buy in and nice profit) xx-xx another 5% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% xxx-xxx 10% ================================================ It is a simple matter to replace the xxx-xxx's with the starting price ranges that you want to start selling off shares. This method does not flood the market with shares and allows the stock price to grow as you sell a little here and there. You don't have to sell them in a day, two, or a month. You just follow your own set selling plan. I have said that I am not selling any shares until the mid. $50 to $65 range, and then about 865 shares of my position! I do not sell on even numbers, I have plans on selling at odd places like EXAMPLE....200 shares at $52.625, 300 shares at $58.125,etc..... Riley G

To: Pugs who wrote (7241)	10/22/1997 2:06:00 AM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 23:49:52 -0400 (EDT) To: nhcom1o@empire.net Subject: 14 million Even on GAAP standards, RMCW still have to put the value of 14million on their books, because this is what is owed. No matter what the price of MVPH is, the value is still 14million. They still have to pay this back to RMCW, whether the stock price of MVPH is .25 or less. If you borrow money from a bank for $10,000, you dont pay them back with only $1000.00 just because your stock price went down. It is not recognized that way. Bottom line is, MVPH still has to pay RMCW 14million and this is recognized on their ASSET side which is ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE. It is a receivable based on a formal agreement between the two companies. And there is no way in court that MVPH will get away with it. AGAIN, it is on their Accounts receivable side which is an ASSET to the company. I verified this myself. I hope this clears the issue.

To: Pugs who wrote (7241)	10/22/1997 2:08:00 AM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 00:06:57 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Fwd: 14 million This is Matty's response!!!!! FYI, to seal the issue on the 14million!!!! --------------------- Forwarded message: From: nhcom1o@empire.net (Matthew Gregg) Reply-to: nhcom1o@empire.net Date: 97-10-22 00:01:09 EDT Ah... I get it... Thanks, Matty Gregg BTW... who are you?

To: Pugs who wrote (7241)	10/22/1997 2:09:00 AM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 00:33:27 -0400 (EDT) To: nhcom1o@empire.net Subject: TOPCAT I told you, TOPCAT wont answer if his question has been answered. He is only here to try and distort information. Apparently, lurkers like us are here to inform him about REAL GAAP (GENERALLY ACEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES)standards. We are ACCOUNTANTS and FINANCIAL ANALYSTS for high tech companies like INTEL,MSFT , APPLE AND SOME biotech companies like GENENTECH!!!!!

To: Pugs who wrote (7241)	10/22/1997 2:10:00 AM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 01:02:22 -0400 (EDT) To: nhcom1o@empire.net Subject: Re: TOPCAT Matty, we dont need to prove anything to anybody anymore. We know what we got and we are taking the MM's down. To be honest with you, we like your posts and appreciate all your help. You are just a step ahead of us in unravelling the info about the NAYS. Anyway, we together with Riley, are the one's who found out all the connections of Dempsey Mork, Jehu hand and randall Baker. We are still looking for one more guy and we are in the process of finding out soon. There is still one more guy out there. Not Alfonso Giacheti (not sure about spelling). Anyway, somebody is looking for that person as we speak. I'm sorry but we prefer to be anonymous. You better decide on what your position will be. Have you seen DANTE'S PEAK. This is a ticking time bomb...VOLCANO ABOUT TO ERUPT! Good luck to you.