Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (93210)	11/3/2008 8:40:03 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541370

No they don't "have the right to ask." Not unless someone who is a party to the lawsuit has standing. Or I guess you could say plaintiffs without standing can ask, but the court has a duty to say "Nope. You don't know the law- go away." Look it up. It's a legal requirement.

To: DMaA who wrote (93210)	11/3/2008 9:07:35 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541370

They have the right to ask The government doesn't have "rights." It has authorities. Those authorities are specified in laws. Government officials act illegally when they exceed their authorities. Of course, courts are not "bureaucrats," so you're changing the subject. On what basis did the court intrude into the process?