Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (145221)	11/3/2008 4:22:45 PM
From: TimF	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

You are saying that because the woman conceived of that fetus, she is not covered by basic human rights, as it pertains to that fetus? No, I'm saying there are two people with basic human rights. If the pregnancy was forced on her, she could try to claim that the other person was assaulting and stealing from her by using her as a host. But if you create the situation where someone is depending on taking from you in order to live, if there would be no dependency except for your actions, than you can't reasonably say the other person can't take from you. There are adults, disabled people who are dependent on their parents their entire lives. Does that mean if a disabled adult murders his parents its "ok" because he was conceived of by those parents? No, it means the parents can't murder the kid, not that the kid can murder the parents.