Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (145236)	11/3/2008 5:49:32 PM
From: TimF	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

You said the PARENT of the fetus is not eligible for human rights because she chose to conceive of the fetus. I said nothing of the sort. What I said is that the child isn't infringing on the rights of the parent if the parent caused the dependency. The woman has rights, but they are not violated by not allowing her to kill someone, because that someone is taking from her, when she created the dependent situation in the first place. Generally I would not have a right to steal bottles of water from you. Doing so would violate your rights. But if you abducted me and took me in the middle of a desert, I'd have the right, to steal your water in order to survive, because you created a situation where I would die without using your resources.