Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (89681)	11/4/2008 6:14:14 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	1 Recommendation Respond to of 116555

Mish they all anticipate a season rally and election relief rally - trader will make money suck in some gullible retail investors who will loose money BWDIK

To: mishedlo who wrote (89681)	11/4/2008 7:30:20 AM
From: see clearly now	Respond to of 116555

.....your wisdom is showing though..consistent sequence of overviews! thanks.

To: mishedlo who wrote (89681)	11/4/2008 8:01:49 AM
From: Crimson Ghost	1 Recommendation Respond to of 116555

Even when a new bull does develop it is likely to be quite tame compared to the last one IMHO. The kind of leverage that pushed so many assets to absurd levels during the 2003-08 bull may not be seen again in our lifetimes.

To: mishedlo who wrote (89681)	11/4/2008 9:23:08 AM
From: Sr K	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

MarketWatch, the Wall Street Journal, and Barron's are all properties of News Corporation, so I don't count that as anything but one voice.

To: mishedlo who wrote (89681)	11/5/2008 9:35:10 AM
From: SouthFloridaGuy	Respond to of 116555

Mish, your site is down, but I thought the line asking who would want to sit and wait for S&P500 below 600 was classic. Sometimes these academics get too theoretical. We just experienced a 40% drop and it wasn't fun, now they are saying we could have another 40% drop and we should begin to buy now and/or not sell because we're undervalued in the long-term?