Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (145784)	11/5/2008 7:09:29 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

so you agree that Bush won in 2000 because of the 14th amendment. the vote was 7-2

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (145784)	11/5/2008 9:01:41 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

There is nothing about anyone can marry anyone in the 14th amendment. Gay couples form family units that are as strong, supportive, and nurturing as hetero families. Not really. Hardly any male-male marriages are faithful to their wedding vows while most m-f marriages are. 64% of syphilis cases are gay men, who are only 2% of the male population. You have demonstrated that the lack of proper anti-predator education extends even to adults. Most predators KNOW the child - a relative, teacher, neighbor, coach, etc. Thats because most parents protect their kids from strangers and teach their children to be wary of strangers. That most child abuse is done by people who know the child, does NOT mean that strangers are harmless and less potentially threatening as a class than people who know the child, its simply that people who know the child have greater access to children than strangers. In addition, bringing in gay people to teach kids about gay sex in the classroom, makes those gay people "people who KNOW the child - ... teacher ..", rather than strangers, thus undercutting your argument. They must be taught that they should not allow anyone to touch them in a way that makes them uncomfortable Which has nothing to do with gay sex education to small kids. Pro gay sex education is more likely to make kids accept as comfortable inappropriate touching by perverts. BTW pro gay sex education is NOT about anti-predator teaching. Its about teaching kids to think gay sex is normal and okay.