SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ManyMoose who wrote (279163)11/6/2008 11:49:16 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793955
 
he also is putting his money into huge investment in scotland vs usa. to build a resort , golf club. etc..

another example of money leaving usa because of gov, politics etc that hurt trying to get any investment done.



To: ManyMoose who wrote (279163)11/6/2008 11:55:58 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793955
 
Utterly, drearily, predictable.

they are not lending the money like they were supposed to.

All they were "supposed" to do is not fail.



To: ManyMoose who wrote (279163)11/6/2008 12:39:00 PM
From: steve harris1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793955
 
I had read somewhere before our bailout, that's what the European banks did, we knew this was going to happen.

If you have some spare time, start looking into people's backgrounds involved in the finance sector who are now and were in politics. Notice how many are Goldman Sachs alumnists....

Corzine, the gov of NJ, left GS with 400 million and now wants a bailout.

Rubin, use to work at GS and Clinton secretary, now at Citigroup.

Paulson, use to be at GS.

Paulson's protege, now appointed to run the distribution of the gazillion dollar redistribution of America's wealth, Kashkari use to work at GS.....

So on and so forth.

What does it mean? We may see a real battle between cash and socialism in this administration when the easy money runs out.